-1 in this test is only a sample of a bad constant. Do you sure
that S_OK should be returned for any positive argument?
> wine-1.0.1
Try to use 1.3.15 with a patch for it.
> phoenox@firebird:~/.wine/drive_c/DSO8000$ WINEDEBUG=+winedevice,
> +ntoskrnl,+usbhub wine ezusb.sys
Do not run the driver manually. Put it in windows/system32/drivers and run
your program under WINE, the driver will be loaded if your USB dev
> I have winedumped all the .sys files and tared them together here:
> http://goo.gl/bEu03
Drivers import smclib.sys and wmilib.sys which are not implemented. And I
doubt that they will be implemented soon (or ever).
Also winscard way seems to me to be more right in this case.
Hi,
Can you show an output of winedump -x for installed drivers?
In okenadmin.exe output there are fixme:winscard: messages. May be this patch
can be useful:
http://www.idrix.fr/Root/SCard4Wine/winscard.tar.gz
Thanks,
Alexander
Some Windows programs use Shell.Application object (sample:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8987). This object has IShellDispatch,
IShellDispatch2, IShellDispatch3, ... interfaces
(http://www.com.it-berater.org/COM/windows_shell/interfaces/IShellDispatch.htm).
If IShellDispatch is suffi
Thank you, I looked at test results and sent some patches.
> Could you have a look? If you need me to test something on my boxes
> (pv-winme and pv-nt4srvr) let me know (not all testbot machines fail here).
Please do not apply this patch. Use [try 2]
> I have attached DVEdit.log.txt.
In addition to problem with loading npf.sys, icdusb2.sys tries to use
KeInitializeDeviceQueue which is not implemented and crashes.
> err:module:import_dll Library NDIS.SYS (which is needed by
> L"C:\\windows\\system32\\drivers\\npf.sys") not found
> err:winedevice:ServiceMain driver L"npf" failed to load
Likely icdusb2.sys is not the only driver needed for your device. And other
drivers installed by DVESetup_EN.exe are not w
Dear Teo En Ming,
Most likely something is not implemented in wine and usb patch and it is not
so fast to fix it. You can run
wineserver -k
WINEDEBUG=+winedevice,+ntoskrnl,+usbhub,+setupapi,+file wine your_program &>
log
and try to find what is bad in log
Best regards,
Alexander Moro
> Before I go off and try to update your USB device support for the latest
> Wine release, are you continuing to maintain this code current to the Wine
> Development and Wine Stable trunks?
I will update patches.
Thanks,
Alexander
> I think we already create our own dll's for testing purposes, see
> kernel32/tests/loader.c (test_Loader()).
>
> Will that suffice?
Thanks. This is what is need.
> This should most likely be done in ntdll. Also please add tests for
> these different cases.
For tests should create dll which can be loaded. But I do not know how to
implement this in tests on WINE. I tried to copy and rename .exe.so module
but it seems like the problem is existing only for P
> - The files from ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/people/amorozov/usb/current/ miss
> lines in configure.ac to trigger the Makefile generation for usbd.sys and
> usbhub.sys.
The part which is generated by tools/make_makefiles is not included in these
patches.
> Both dll/drivers pair (libusb0.dll/li
> trying to use the supplied or the mingw (cross) compiled libusb0.sys from
> sourceforge with the USB enabled tree from
> http://git.etersoft.ru/people/lav/packages/wine.git
>
> loading libusb0.sys fails:
Drivers built with WinDDK is not page-aligned and
(nt->OptionalHeader.SectionAlignment <=
On Thursday 19 February 2009 16:55:20 emiliano esposito wrote:
> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
> usbd.sys.USBD_GetUSBDIVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7ee2e923)
You can try attached patch
From b7fad82130608126244ba2aee3f91b3337229fb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander M
> Unhandled exception: unimplemented function
> usbd.sys.USBD_GetUSBDIVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7ee2e923)
Should implement USBD_GetUSBDIVersion to fix this.
> Now I kindly ask: is there a simple way to integrate the official branch
> with just the USB patches?
You can use patches for wine-1.1.15 and git am.
> If that USB Key is not of a supportable kind, then I apologize for asking.
I think you should try.
This patch is made, first of all, for running applications protected with USB
keys.
For using native USB driver should copy
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Enum\USB\Vid_&Pid_ and
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\ from Windows registry.
The driver should be put in the directory specified b
Minor updated patches:
ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/people/amorozov/usb/1.1.15/0001-Add-support-of-native-Windows-drivers-for-USB-tokens.txt
ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/people/amorozov/usb/1.1.15/0002-Re-generate-some-files.txt
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 15:02:23 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Your design needs a lot more thought. You can't add all these
> Wine-specific modules, or make winedevice special-case usb devices, or
> poll the server for the add_device request like you do. All this needs
> to be properly integrated
Please, use this patch instead of previous "ntoskrnl.exe: Implement
Io{Allocate,Get}DriverObjectExtension."
From b5441d22fe51640849436b563ca3ab6c9a80c1a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Morozov
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:44:46 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ntoskrnl.exe: Implement I
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 03:52:01 ricardo filipe wrote:
> this is for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12628
This is fastcall function. It should be defined like KfAcquireSpinLock.
Hello,
I sent patch "Add support of WDM drivers for USB devices." in October and
received such reply from Alexandre Julliard:
> Your design needs a lot more thought. You can't add all these
> Wine-specific modules, or make winedevice special-case usb devices, or
> poll the server for the add_dev
n kernel address space.
What is better decision?
Thanks,
Alexander Morozov
> Patchwatcher doesn't know what to do with partial
> resends yet (eventually it will ignore them).
> At the moment I have to delete them manually, else
> patchwatcher gets confused and waits for the rest of the series.
> - Dan
I looked at patchwatcher results. Making patch [5/9] failed because af
> 2008/10/6 Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr)
> > USBD_CreateConfigurationRequestEx
>
> ...
>
> > +@ stdcall [EMAIL PROTECTED](ptr ptr long long
> > long long long) USBD_ParseConfigurationDescriptorEx +@
Hello,
What should modify in these patches that they can be accepted:
[try 5] [1/4] dlls/Maketest.rules.in: Add support of building various
resources for cross and usual tests
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/060204.html
[try 5] [2/4] Add tests for ntoskrnl.exe
http://www
> I have been looking at writing a couple of tests for ntoskrl functions
> but I have had difficulty locating a suitable place. It sort of looks
> like ntdll/tests is the place but it is not clear. Is there a guide
> for locating this one?
>
> Jeff
Now I am working on ntoskrnl tests. I am
> Yes, add conformance tests for the new ntoskrnl functions
> and usbd.sys, and break the patch up a lot...
Conformance tests should consist of a driver and a program to load
it. I do not know other method to call functions from ntoskrnl.exe and
usbd.sys on Windows. But I have a problem with bui
> Split it at least into the sub driver/dll parts.
>
> You can leave out the "configure" part, it will be regenerated form
> configure. ac anyway. Same for dlls/Makefile.in
>
> The ntoskrnl changes might break the already working copy protection
> drivers, so either try them yourself after the patc
make some
changes?
Thanks,
Alexander Morozov
Changelog:
fix InternetErrorDlg crash
From 6ab5655ebe26611387c2586b06fad78c16de7239 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:05:40 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] wininet: fix crash
---
dlls/wininet/dialogs.c |3 +++
dlls/wininet
Changelog:
Add InternetErrorDlg tests
I ran these tests on Win98 and WinXP
From 687f7d365b97d1da95db222e5bd5bbdf5c62c76f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:01:42 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] wininet/tests: add InternetErrorDlg tests
---
Changelog:
InternetErrorDlg should return ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED if error is not supported
From b89937296efd5a45772027f07b2fdbf80b5f480d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:07:34 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] wininet: InternetErrorDlg should
> I just had a check for the testRegisterAndGetDetail test on Vista (dunno
> about the other tests and platforms yet).
>
> I added the SetupDiRemoveDevice (as was suggested by Alexander) at the end
> of this test.
>
> On a clean registry this works out fine (one DeviceClasses key is left but
> that
> Can someone confirm that after running the devinst tests, the registry on
> Wine still shows these:
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Enum\ROOT\LEGACY_BOGUS (and
> stuff below)
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Enum\USB\BOGUS (and stuff
> below)
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\
I was mistaken. Enum/ROOT/LEGACY_BOGUS key can be deleted so:
SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
set = pSetupDiGetClassDevsA(&guid, NULL, 0, 0);
ok(set != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "SetupDiGetClassDevsA failed: %08x\n",
GetLastError());
SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
ret = pSetupDiEnumDeviceInfo(set, 0, &devInfo);
В сообщении от Tuesday 20 May 2008 17:31:48 Paul Vriens написал(а):
> Hi,
>
> On several windows boxes (VMware) I receive this nice message that Windows
> will try to find a driver for an unknown device.
>
> This device is added by the setupapi/devinst test and is not (or can't be?)
> properly remo
> Why didn't you fix InterlockedExchangeAdd too?
Yes, this function also should be fixed. I will send new patch. Sorry. I got
confused because this function worked:
#include "wdm.h"
#pragma code_seg("INIT")
NTSTATUS DriverEntry(IN PDRIVER_OBJECT DriverObject,
IN PUNICODE_STRING Registry
> > SETUPDI_AddDeviceToSet: changing pointers on SP_DEVINFO_DATA after
> > allocating new memory block for their array
>
> We shouldn't have to do that sort of thing. The data structure should be
> fixed to store pointers that don't have to be moved around.
Should modify DeviceInfoSet and _SP_DEVI
В сообщении от Thursday 27 March 2008 16:24:52 Dmitry Timoshkov написал(а):
> "Alexander Morozov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > Added a test for setupapi: registering device interface and getting
> > device path
>
> Please consistently pri
42 matches
Mail list logo
