Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-05 Thread Albert Lee
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 02/03/2011 09:17 AM, Albert Lee wrote: >> >> The instructions were intended to give some context for users who >> might not be familiar with the ~ expansion. > > Then mention that if you must. "~"

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-05 Thread Albert Lee
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Gert van den Berg wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 18:17, Albert Lee wrote: >> The instructions were intended to give some context for users who >> might not be familiar with the ~ expansion. > > Using {$HOME} would be more portable. The Bour

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-03 Thread Albert Lee
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, David Laight wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 11:17:39AM -0500, Albert Lee wrote: >> >> > >> >> ?It's exec(2)'ed so it doesn't matter what the program is. >> > >> > Basically run in a shell. So y

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-03 Thread Albert Lee
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 02/02/2011 09:52 PM, Albert Lee wrote: >> >> I meant 'cd' is the command preceding this one in the block this is a >> part of, if you look at the context. > > Then you should remove that cd inste

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-02 Thread Albert Lee
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 02/01/2011 09:47 PM, Albert Lee wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Vitaliy  wrote: >>>> >>>> -cd ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files >>>> +cd .wine/drive_c/Program\ Files >&g

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-02 Thread Albert Lee
I notice you reverted the changes after I addressed these issues, care to explain why? On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Albert Lee wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Vitaliy wrote: >> On 01/29/2011 12:21 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >>> >>> Hi Albert, >>> ht

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-02 Thread Albert Lee
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:18:40 -0500 > Albert Lee wrote: > >> >> I notice you have reverted my edits to the FAQ on the wiki ( >> http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ?action=info ). As I was trying to clarify >> the sh

Re: Wine FAQ edits

2011-02-01 Thread Albert Lee
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Vitaliy wrote: > On 01/29/2011 12:21 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >> >> Hi Albert, >> http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ?action=diff&rev2=384&rev1=383 looks >> like it was a pretty big edit. >> >> Try smaller ones, and try to do just one kind of change per edit. > > That, and the

Wine FAQ edits

2011-01-29 Thread Albert Lee
Hi Vitaliy, I notice you have reverted my edits to the FAQ on the wiki ( http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ?action=info ). As I was trying to clarify the shell metacharacter information and operating system/platform support, and add new file association instructions, I would like to know why this happened

Re: GPU driver version reporting

2010-06-01 Thread Albert Lee
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:14:34 +, Seth Shelnutt wrote: > I am trying to get folding at home gpu client working. The issue we are > having now is that it detects the driver version and says it is not > right, and it won't proceed. I've searched through the lines of a > WINEDEBUG=+trace and I think

Re: What is the point of mincore() in reserve_area( ) in libs/wine/mmap.c?

2010-05-05 Thread Albert Lee
On Tue, 04 May 2010 10:22:44 -0600, Charles Davis wrote: > On 5/4/10 10:17 AM, Johann "Myrkraverk" Oskarsson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In the Solaris/BSD implementation of reserve_area() in libs/wine/mmap.c >> there is >> >> for (i = 0; i < size; i += pagesize) >> if (mincore(

Re: [PATCH] RFC: C99: rewrote some extern inline to static inline

2010-04-15 Thread Albert Lee
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:56:32 +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > In order to build with CLANG with default arguments, extern inline > declaration > must be changed. > > By default CLANG uses C99's "extern inline" semantic which is like > gcc's "inline", and not the expected gcc's "extern inline" behavo

Re: configure.ac: detect libusb-1.0

2010-03-24 Thread Albert Lee
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:43:22 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Albert Lee wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:15:59 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic >> wrote: >>> Changelog: >>> * configure.ac: detect libusb-1.0 >>> >> >&

Re: configure.ac: detect libusb-1.0

2010-03-24 Thread Albert Lee
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:15:59 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Changelog: > * configure.ac: detect libusb-1.0 > There are multiple libusb implementations (notably, Solaris libusb and FreeBSD libusb20) and it would be necessary to do an API test for those, rather than using pkgconfig. -Albert

Re: Problems compiling Wine 1.1.39 in Solaris 10

2010-03-04 Thread Albert Lee
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:05:55 +, Dimitris Vikeloudas wrote: > Hi there > > I am trying to compile wine 1.1.39 for Solaris 10 x86 technology. > > I stack on compilation errors of the acledit dll. I am not sure how to > proceed forward. > > I used ./tools/wineinstall and the latest GNU tools

Re: Firefox not installing with winetricks. Reason: need to upgrade 3.5.3 to 3.5.5.

2009-11-22 Thread Albert Lee
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:49:13 -0800, Ido Tal wrote: > Hi, > > I've just now tried to install firefox with winetricks and failed. A short > scan reveals what the problem is (I think): the version winetricks is > trying > to install is 3.5.3. Looking at > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/

Re: usp10: Resend - usp10: Implement and test Script{Apply, Record}DigitSubstitution.

2006-09-02 Thread Albert Lee
On Saturday 02 September 2006 12:08 am, you wrote: > Albert Lee wrote: > > +TRACE("%p, %p, %p\n", sds, sc, ss); > > + > > +SCRIPT_DIGITSUBSTITUTE psds; > > + > > This causes a warning: > > gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../includ