Maarten, could you look at http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16297
as you're the author of 717df5b2972b3cb998ca5a43279ae2283b117eaa? I
tried adding you as CC but bugzilla complained.
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 01:30 +0100, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> +
> +/* Note: Microsoft's d3d9.h does not declare
> IDirect3D9Ex::RegisterSoftwareDevice . This would mean that
> + * the offsets of the other methods in the Vtable change too.
> This, however, seems wrong. In Microsoft's
> +
Was there something wrong with this patch series?
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 11:24 -0500, Adam Petaccia wrote:
> Changelog:
> try3:
> Only copy the bytes we'll use
> Toss out bytesWritten
> try2:
> Fix memcpy() use
> Add documentation
> Add testcase
Ignore. Will resend.
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 13:03 -0500, Adam Petaccia wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdiplus/font.c | 25 +
> dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus.spec |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/gdiplus/font.c b/d
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 17:38 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "slawek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on wrapper(app) which enabled to embed Windows window into
> > xscreensaver-demo window and in screensaver window.
> >
> >
> > Somebody are interested in my app? Maybe some user ne
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 11:01 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been experimenting on my XP and Vista boxes and the only way to make the
> tests run fast is by stopping 'System Restore'.
>
> It makes sense that this has a huge impact on performance, especially with
> the
> big number of i
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:26 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into the recent test failures for the msi/package tests on my
> WinXP box.
>
> The reason for most of them was a stray MSITEST package that couldn't be
> removed
> via the 'Add/Remove Programs' (had to remove stuff f
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 01:14 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you may know yesterday was the pens down for summer of code 2008
> Students are still allowed to write code, but it won't count for the
> mentors evaluation any more.
I intend to clean up and make sure almost everything
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 19:32 +0100, Reece Dunn wrote:
> 2008/8/13 Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Its customary to make a function return NotImplemented in Gdiplus, if
> > its just a dummy function that does nothing and returns. But .NET seems
> > to check for
Its customary to make a function return NotImplemented in Gdiplus, if
its just a dummy function that does nothing and returns. But .NET seems
to check for this and throw an exception, crashing the program anyway.
See bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 for details, but
originally a p
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 22:24 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Zachary Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Policy is that all patches should be independent, no?
> >
> > There is no such a policy. Dependent patches are marked as
> > 1/xx, 2/xx, ... x
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 20:03 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The recent additions to the dplayx tests make these tests run very slow (or
> there is just a lot tested?).
>
> Is there a way to either split up these tests so they don't timeout or better
> yet find out if we can run them faster.
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 11:11 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Some comments inlined below:
Thanks for the review.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:22:56AM -0400, Adam Petaccia wrote:
> > diff --git a/dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus_private.h b/dlls/gdiplus/gdiplus_private.h
>
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 22:08 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> Adam Petaccia wrote:
> >@@ -226,6 +277,11 @@ GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipSetEmpty(GpRegion*region)
> >
> > if(!(calls++))
> > FIXME("not implemented\n");
> >+TRACE("%p\n&q
For me make crosstest fails on comctl32, is anyone else seeing this? Or
have I missed a secret step?
make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/cvs/wine/dlls/comctl32/tests'
i586-mingw32msvc-windres -i rsrc.res -o rsrc.res.cross.o
i586-mingw32msvc-windres: rsrc.res: Not a valid WIN32 resource fil
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 12:20 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> Adam Petaccia wrote:
> > @@ -226,6 +277,11 @@ GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipSetEmpty(GpRegion*region)
> >
> > if(!(calls++))
> > FIXME("not implemented\n");
> > +TRACE("%p\n&quo
I was just about to reply to your first mail when I found this pop up.
Anyway,
To quote MSDN:
"The Region class describes an area of the display surface. The area can
be any shape. In other words, the boundary of the area can be a
combination of curved and straight lines. Regions can also be c
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 13:20 +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdiplus/tests/font.c |7 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On my Windows system I can't find MSSansSerif, only Microsoft Sans
Serif. I'm not sure if that's a valid test to prove that point.
signature
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:39 -0700, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi students,
>
> As you might know it's time for midterm evaluations. Unfortunately for
> some students I haven't seen the progress they made, and I highly
> encourage all students to send their patches early and often, even if
> it's n
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:57 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > could you have a look at yet more fresh valgrind warnings, triggered by
> > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=d9ac95be5bb51de2293326920c2e
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 23:36 +0800, Huang, Zhangrong wrote:
> This pacth add tests for GdiGetCodePage, which currently don't pass on WIne.
>
> ChangeLog
> gdi32/tests: Add tests for GdiGetCodePage.
>
You didn't attach a patch.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 10:25 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:19 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:19 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Subject: [Gdiplus 6/6] We're not checking to see if these functions
> > succeed or not, they all just return Ok.
> >
&g
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 16:46 +0200, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 27.06.2008, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Huw Davies:
> > > static const REAL mm_per_pixel = 25.4;
> > > +static const REAL points_per_inch = 1/72;
> > >
> >
> > I know there are several definitions of a point, but none are this
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 10:41 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the mentioned tests crashes when run via Paul Millar's
> winetest executable. Compiling myself and running the test works fine.
>
> Any one else seeing this?
>
I've noticed it crashes if Wine is compiled with -O0
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:56 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > I found it very handy to track down details on mswsock the other day.
> >
> > I suggest if it is to be removed instead dull it down by turning it in
> > to a list of dlls wine has and all available information in the form
> > of links for
d be
decided to update or remove the page.
My vote would be for updating, but I'm not sure where those stats come
from, and that may take away from time better spent on bug hunting.
--
Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
While I'd like to stay positive, this report assumes that all users who
have an application that doesn't work immediately run out and report it
to the AppDB as garbage (and while I know the same is true for apps that
do work, I'd assume its a much higher proportion of the the former).
On Sun, 2008
> 4. For each app you test, add a test report into Wine's AppDB.
>
> As a token of our thanks, we will pick one of the users who submits
> a healthy set of useful test results and send him or her a tasteful
> Wine-themed goodie of some sort.
>
> So fire up your keyboards and start testing!
> Th
> Could the students come forward and say something about themself?
Hello Wine world, my name is Adam Petaccia, and this summer I will be
working on Wine's GDI+ implementation, so more applications can work
"out of the box". I am currently a student at the University of North
Ca
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:58 +0100, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Adam Petaccia wrote:
> > This patch is needed for me to run Tabula Rasa.
> >
> > This is my first patch, so please tell if I've broken conventions.
> Please add the correct declarations for "stru
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 20:10 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Not a real question, but I thought this graph was interesting:
>
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=dreamweaver+linux%2C+%22world+of+warcraft%22+linux%2C++itunes+linux%2C+photoshop+linux
>
> It seems iTunes on Linux is twice as popular a query
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 23:07 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello!
>
> King InuYasha wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
> > a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
> > which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudi
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:56 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Looks as if SkyOS will soon support Wine!
But I don't think it supports the graphical aspects of wine, just
command line and the infrastructure, if I recall correctly.
> Internals
> - Many kernel updates like LDT support (re
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 01:28 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If someone is interested in leading the Ubuntu-wine team, please contact me.
I was actually looking at how to do that earlier today. I would like to
volunteer for the position.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
This patch makes the Guild Wars show up in all its glory.
upWtoA
> +windows/clipboard.c RegisterClipboardFormatW: illegal call to
> RegisterClipboardFormatA
> +windows/cursoricon.c map_fileW: illegal call to CreateFileMappingA
> +windows/defwnd.c DEFWND_ImmIsUIMessageW: illegal call to GetModuleHandleA
> +windows/winhelp.c WinHelpW: illegal call to WinHelpA
> +windows/winhelp.c WinHelpW: illegal call to WinHelpA
> +windows/winproc.c CallWindowProcW: illegal call to WINPROC_CallProc32WTo32A
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_MapMsg16To32W: illegal call to CREATESTRUCT16to32A
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_MapMsg16To32W: illegal call to
> MDICREATESTRUCT16to32A
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_MapMsg16To32W: illegal call to
> WINPROC_MapMsg16To32A
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_MapMsg32ATo32W: illegal call to GetWindowLongA
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_UnmapMsg16To32W: illegal call to
> WINPROC_UnmapMsg16To32A
> +windows/winproc.c WINPROC_UnmapMsg32ATo32W: illegal call to GetWindowLongA
>
>
>Please note that patches have been submitted for the class=submitted>italic entries;
>
>
>
--
Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wouldn't passing -m32 (if I recall correctly) to gcc tell it to produce
32 bit code?
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 14:55 +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know how to force gcc to compile in 32 bit mode on 64 bit
> chips, and if so could they please write a patch? I've seen quite a few
> po
38 matches
Mail list logo
