Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gladly take the side of vitamin on this issue. I believe he is a
> valuable member of the FOSS community, he has contributed many patches
> to this and other OSS projects. And in HIS free time he volunteers on
> the #winehq IRC channel to help people who
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So does that test behave differently for you with your patch? Does it
> show that things are fixed? Which font are you testing with?
The patch adds a missing else to the codepage tests in
WineEngEnumFonts(), making it handle DEFAULT_CHARSET rather
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > There is a patch proposed at the bug #7571
> > (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7571).
> > It works very well and I did not experiment any regression. Maybe
> > it is not the ideal patch and if it is not, maybe we c
