> "However, disassembling NT implementation (WIN32K.SYS) reveals
> that."
...
> Does this not violate a clean rooming the implementation? The ReactOS
> code is a derived work of the Wine code in the case and if soon then we
> have to remove it.
Whoa! Slow down there John Wayne! Disassembly
On Friday 21 May 2004 06:26, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Basicly, when emulated windows version is set to NT4, 2000, XP or 2003,
> WINE should pretend to apps that its running on NTFS.
Why? Other than implementing those horrid ACLs, of what use would that be?
NT4, 2000, and XP applications run just
<>I believe the correct fix is to change DEFDLG_InitDlgInfo (defdlg.c)
to not be static and then to call it instead of DIALOG_get_info on
line 636 of dialog.c I don't have much time at the moment, so could
someone check this is right and if so submit a patch?
<>Rob
Since DEFDLG_InitDlgInfo call
Is it just me, or is some one posing as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sending e-mail virii into the mailing list? My ISP filtered
it before I could get it, and it's a Windows virus so I doubt it could do
very much damage. The virus is described as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone is being ra
I removed this article speculating on the true nature of David based on
further technical analysis of my hypothesis. Held as much water as SpecOpS
claims does. Sorry to waste your time :)
I think I know what this David thing is all about!
Please Read:
http://www.datiku.com/articles/david.php
> - They will build this David thing in 6 - 8 weeks
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. I wouldn't touch this thing
with a thirty foot pole.
