On 01.10.2013 12:40, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Ralf Habacker writes:
>
>> On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>> Ralf Habacker writes:
>>>
With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in
On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Ralf Habacker writes:
>
>> With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
>> driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
>> level function it looks like having driver specific stuff using display
>
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2427
Your paranoid andr
Ok, fixed and resent
-aric
On 10/1/13 2:13 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Aric Stewart writes:
>
>> @@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmCreateContext(void)
>> gl->dwSize = sizeof(GUIDELINE);
>> ImmUnlockIMCC(new_context->IMC.hGuideLine);
>>
>> +memset(new_context->IMC.cfCandF
Aric Stewart writes:
> @@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmCreateContext(void)
> gl->dwSize = sizeof(GUIDELINE);
> ImmUnlockIMCC(new_context->IMC.hGuideLine);
>
> +memset(new_context->IMC.cfCandForm, -1,
> sizeof(new_context->IMC.cfCandForm));
> +
That's ugly. If you are using th
Any reason not to share code with CLRCreateInstance?
Akihiro Sagawa writes:
> Try 2:
>- Get rid of redundant trace message in the last patch.
>
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/freetype.c |2 +-
> dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c |8 +++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This is causing failures here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wi
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2421
Your paranoid andr
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Francois Gouget wrote:
[...]
> The timeout was too short and would only work for UARTs that have a
> FIFO and where the trigger level was set just right. With this patch
> we calculate how much time sending the test data will actually take
> and tack on a small margin to take
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2420
Your paranoid andr
Seems reasonable, but could you put together some tests to show this?
Andrew
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> diff --git a/dlls/dsound/capture.c b/dlls/dsound/capture.c
> index 40f1702..0fe300c 100644
> --- a/dlls/dsound/capture.c
> +++ b/dlls/dsound/capture.c
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2419
Your paranoid andr
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 09:32 -0300, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > ---
> > dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 9 +
> > dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> ---
> dlls/ws2_32/socket.c | 9 +
> dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c b/dlls/ws2_32/socket.c
> index c34de4b..6855298 100644
> --- a/dll
Please split this.
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> The tests show that this is how fully up to date Windows versions starting
> from XP behave, isn't that convincing enough? If not, what else do you need
> to see?
An application that breaks because of this.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Do you propose to leave NtWriteFile/NtReadFile in the state when they
> > return STATUS_SUCCESS for overlapped writes and reads? But that's clearly
> > not how Windows implements this accordingto the tests, and that would
> > require changing all the tests to accept
Ralf Habacker writes:
> On 01.10.2013 12:12, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Ralf Habacker writes:
>>
>>> With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
>>> driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
>>> level function it looks like having driver
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Do you propose to leave NtWriteFile/NtReadFile in the state when they
> return STATUS_SUCCESS for overlapped writes and reads? But that's clearly
> not how Windows implements this accordingto the tests, and that would
> require changing all the tests to accept both valu
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> >> I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
> >
> > When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to
> > require running under Vista+ was the difference in overlapped IO behavior.
> > On the other hand the tests
Hans Leidekker writes:
> @@ -129,11 +129,19 @@ static const RTL_OSVERSIONINFOEXW
> VersionData[NB_WINDOWS_VERSIONS] =
> 4, 0, 0, VER_NT_WORKSTATION, 30 /* FIXME: Great, a reserved field
> with a value! */
> },
> /* WINXP */
> +#ifdef _WIN64
> +{
> +sizeof(RTL_OSVE
Ralf Habacker writes:
> With other patches i have been told to implement such stuff in the dib
> driver. Unfortunally this do not works in this case, because in the top
> level function it looks like having driver specific stuff using display
> coordinates.
It would still most likely have to be
Hi,
Changelog:
mscoree: Implement CreateInterface
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
>From 6e4b9aff1f2a8776be0ad3cf6e9d0404dd5bec29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:17:50 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Implement CreateInterface
---
dlls/
Hi,
Corrected warnings.
Changelog: Implement IDataSourceLocator get/put hWnd
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
>From 13b8466033f24db028bfed6de609c4cd5f84b14a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:01 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Implement IDataSour
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this?
>
> When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to
> require running under Vista+ was the difference in overlapped IO behavior.
> On the
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2414
Your paranoid andr
26 matches
Mail list logo
