Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2144
Your paranoid andr
Ken Thomases wrote:
> >> +@ cdecl __wine_get_min_max_info(long ptr ptr ptr ptr) WINPOS_GetMinMaxInfo
> >
> > What's wrong with calling SendMessage(WM_GETMINMAXINFO) from the driver?
>
> Because I would have to duplicate all of the rest of the logic in
> WINPOS_GetMinMaxInfo(), too.
Do you rea
Aric Stewart writes:
> @@ -1262,6 +1290,70 @@ static void test_GetCharABCWidths(void)
> }
>
> ReleaseDC(NULL, hdc);
> +
> +memset(&lf, 0, sizeof(lf));
> +strcpy(lf.lfFaceName, "Tahoma");
> +lf.lfHeight = 20;
> +
> +#define helper_ABC(a) (winetest_set_location(__FILE__,__LI
On Sep 12, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Ken Thomases wrote:
>
+@ cdecl __wine_get_min_max_info(long ptr ptr ptr ptr) WINPOS_GetMinMaxInfo
>>>
>>> What's wrong with calling SendMessage(WM_GETMINMAXINFO) from the driver?
>>
>> Because I would have to duplicate all of the res
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2136
Your paranoid andr
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Ken Thomases wrote:
>
>> +@ cdecl __wine_get_min_max_info(long ptr ptr ptr ptr) WINPOS_GetMinMaxInfo
>
> What's wrong with calling SendMessage(WM_GETMINMAXINFO) from the driver?
Because I would have to duplicate all of the rest of the log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-12 13:36, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> I really just meant the typo in the comment.
Ah yes, that should be "distorted".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmai
On 12 September 2013 13:33, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 2013-09-12 12:44, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> On 12 September 2013 12:23, Stefan Dösinger
>> wrote:
>>> + * On the r500 driver on Windows D3DCMP_GREATER and
>>> D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL are br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-12 12:44, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 12 September 2013 12:23, Stefan Dösinger
> wrote:
>> + * On the r500 driver on Windows D3DCMP_GREATER and
>> D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL are broken for depth + * values > 0.5.
>> The range appears to be
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> > This matches WriteFile behaviour and ensures that invalid parameters are
>> > properly handled and fields in the OVERLAPPED structure are initialized.
>>
>> This is again causing test failures. Please do a full test run before
>> sendi
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > This matches WriteFile behaviour and ensures that invalid parameters are
> > properly handled and fields in the OVERLAPPED structure are initialized.
>
> This is again causing test failures. Please do a full test run before
> sending patches.
Could you please list
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> This matches WriteFile behaviour and ensures that invalid parameters are
> properly handled and fields in the OVERLAPPED structure are initialized.
This is again causing test failures. Please do a full test run before
sending patches.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@w
On 12 September 2013 12:23, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> + * On the r500 driver on Windows D3DCMP_GREATER and D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL
> are broken for depth
> + * values > 0.5. The range appears to be distored, apparently an
> incoming value of ~0.875 is
"distorted"?
13 matches
Mail list logo
