Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Printing complete lsr value in the log may help with diagnosing
> test failures on Alexandre's machine.
This patch is marked as 'Build failure' in the tracker, but I've checked it
once again and compiles just fine here. What kind of build failure is that?
--
Dmitry.
On Aug 29, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> Hi all, I need some help to continue my current wine work.
>
> In order to implement SO_PROTOCOL_INFO for getsockopt I need to
> retrieve some information from the socket like its family and
> protocol.
>
> I have searched for a few days and end
Hi all, I need some help to continue my current wine work.
In order to implement SO_PROTOCOL_INFO for getsockopt I need to
retrieve some information from the socket like its family and
protocol.
I have searched for a few days and ended up with a solution I dislike
so I had a better idea (at least
André Hentschel writes:
> Am 29.08.2013 23:15, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
>> André Hentschel writes:
>>
>>> Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
Hi,
thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
>>>
>>> How about that?
>>
>> I don't see the point at all. There's
Am 29.08.2013 23:15, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel writes:
>
>> Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
>>> Hi,
>>> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
>>
>> How about that?
>
> I don't see the point at all. There's no reason to add all that
> complexit
André Hentschel writes:
> Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
>> Hi,
>> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
>
> How about that?
I don't see the point at all. There's no reason to add all that
complexity for a purely cosmetic detail.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...
> This solutions implies to modify wine, so do you think that this patch
> or an improved version could be merged into wine?
> Because I don't want to require a custom version of wine.
Even if it were merged, that would not give you the ability to use it
from within a Windows or winelib program. F
Am 29.08.2013 22:46, schrieb Charles Davis:
>
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:35 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>
>> Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
>>> Hi,
>>> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
>>
>> How about that?
> Much better, but...
>>
>> diff --git a/programs/wined
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:43 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 29.08.2013 21:58, schrieb Erich E. Hoover:
>> The "pipelight" guys put together a patch to support XEmbed:
>> http://www.compholio.com/wine-compholio/download.php?file=0008-winex11-Add-minimal-XEmbed-client-support.patch
>>
>> That might
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:35 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
>> Hi,
>> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
>
> How about that?
Much better, but...
>
> diff --git a/programs/winedbg/info.c b/programs/winedbg/info.c
> index c0b86ba..0667
Am 29.08.2013 21:58, schrieb Erich E. Hoover:
> The "pipelight" guys put together a patch to support XEmbed:
> http://www.compholio.com/wine-compholio/download.php?file=0008-winex11-Add-minimal-XEmbed-client-support.patch
>
> That might do what he wants.
might be interesting to clean/fix it up an
Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel:
> Hi,
> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
How about that?
diff --git a/dlls/dbghelp/module.c b/dlls/dbghelp/module.c
index 6bea436..ed1d9c0 100644
--- a/dlls/dbghelp/module.c
+++ b/dlls/dbghelp/module.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
WINE_
The "pipelight" guys put together a patch to support XEmbed:
http://www.compholio.com/wine-compholio/download.php?file=0008-winex11-Add-minimal-XEmbed-client-support.patch
That might do what he wants.
Best,
Erich
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> The systray/notification
The systray/notification area code has to do that:
http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/winex11.drv/systray.c#L620
I don't think it can be done without modifying winex11.drv.
On Aug 29, 2013, at 8:15 AM, matyapiro31 wrote:
>
> <0001-kernel32-change-for-loop-to-optimize.patch><0002-kernel32-change-for-loop-to-optimize.patch>
One patch per email, please. Also, the subject should be more descriptive.
The first one doesn't look much better than the second one (which was
Ralf Habacker writes:
> see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34381
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/painting.c | 18 --
> 1 Datei geändert, 16 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 2 Zeilen entfernt(-)
This would have to be done in the drivers.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hi,
thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do.
On 29 August 2013 11:14, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +BOOL activateapp_received;
> +IDirectDraw *activateapp_ddraw;
> +HWND activateapp_window;
> +DWORD activateapp_coop_level;
> +
I think those should be static, and you'll probably want to put them
in a structure.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:31:06PM +0900, matyapiro31 wrote:
> From
> if ( isalnumW ( wc ) ) return wc;
> for ( i = 0; i < 17; i++ )
> To
> if ( isalnumW ( wc ) ) return wc;
> for ( i = 0; i < 16; i++ )
> and the original version was wrong,too.
> It counts the NULL of the end.
Thats why you should
From
if ( isalnumW ( wc ) ) return wc;
for ( i = 0; i < 17; i++ )
To
if ( isalnumW ( wc ) ) return wc;
for ( i = 0; i < 16; i++ )
and the original version was wrong,too.
It counts the NULL of the end.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:15 AM, matyapiro31 wrote:
The patch could have a better subject =)
> +unix_len=sizeof(unix_vars)/sizeof(unix_vars[0];
Missing the closing ) ? Will this compile?
> -for ( i = 0; i < sizeof (special) / sizeof (WCHAR); i++ )
> +for ( i = 0; i < 17; i++ )
I gu
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:29:43 +0900, �� wrote:
> diff --git a/loader/Makefile.in b/loader/Makefile.in
> index a7ab893..bc11378 100644
> --- a/loader/Makefile.in
> +++ b/loader/Makefile.in
> @@ -20,14 +20,16 @@ MANPAGE = wine.man
> EXTRA_MANPAGES = \
> wine.de.man \
> wine.fr.man \
>
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1918
Your paranoid andro
On 28.08.2013 12:54, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 12:21 +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi.spec b/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi.spec
index 36ba13f..1eed5ae 100644
--- a/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi.spec
+++ b/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi.spec
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
@ stdcall
Hi,
How could I embed a HWND window created with CreateWindow() into an X11 window?
Thanks! :-)
--
Alexandre Bique
Am Donnerstag, 29. August 2013, 10:47:46 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
> Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > I think that happens:
> >
> > * application writes data to com port.
> > * all is written, serial buffer is empty
> > * application calls WaitCommEvent()
> > * wait_on() is called
> > * wait_on() call
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Based on a patch of Wolfgang Walter.
Is there anything wrong with this patch?
--
Dmitry.
27 matches
Mail list logo