Vincent Povirk wrote:
> There's a TIFF_VERSION define that seems to have been renamed to
> TIFF_VERSION_CLASSIC in 4.0.
>
> It doesn't make sense to do the check at runtime, given we're only
> going to link to one of the versions.
TIFF_VERSION_CLASSIC reflects the TIFF format itself, it's defin
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:49:55 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> On 26/07/13 19:42, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> > But admins no longer have the power to delete users, so there's nothing I
> > can do to stop him from continually resubmitting it.
>
> This is a real pain. Was it intentional or a bug that'
On 26/07/13 19:42, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
But admins no longer have the power to delete users, so there's nothing I can
do to stop him from continually resubmitting it.
This is a real pain. Was it intentional or a bug that's slipped in?
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:47:36 +0100
Ken Sharp wrote:
> I have to ask:
>
> Do we really think that this user is running Wine 1.0.1 on Windows 7 64-bit?
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=28587&iTestingId=79589
>
>
No; letting it through was my mistake. This was actua
Am 26.07.2013 17:47, schrieb Ken Sharp:
> I have to ask:
>
> Do we really think that this user is running Wine 1.0.1 on Windows 7 64-bit?
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=28587&iTestingId=79589
>
>
Ask him what he really wanted to choose.
There's a TIFF_VERSION define that seems to have been renamed to
TIFF_VERSION_CLASSIC in 4.0.
It doesn't make sense to do the check at runtime, given we're only
going to link to one of the versions.
I have to ask:
Do we really think that this user is running Wine 1.0.1 on Windows 7 64-bit?
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=28587&iTestingId=79589
