Sorry, should have replied to this.
These tests shouldn't even run on 2000, already seen e.g. in
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2013-April/099536.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-November/097823.html
Let me know if there's any issues.
Thanks,
Thomas
On 2013-07-1
Am 16.07.2013 19:59, schrieb Julian Rüger:
> Hi all!
>
> While working on the translation of the (main) manpage, I noticed a few
> issues in the English version and started working on a patch. That was
> quite some time ago, I had little spare time lately and didn't get
> around to finish and send
Hi all!
While working on the translation of the (main) manpage, I noticed a few
issues in the English version and started working on a patch. That was
quite some time ago, I had little spare time lately and didn't get
around to finish and send it in. So I figured I just take what I have
now and as
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Frédéric Delanoy
wrote:
> ---
> loader/wine.man.in | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Please ignore this patch: I accidentally resent it.
Sorry about the noise.
Frédéric
-<<< HEAD
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-07-13 04:49+0200\n"
-===
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-07-04 00:10+0200\n"
->>> 598685e6c5992355de35b4345e91eb4e50b9f07e
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-07-13 05:00+0200\n"
[...]
-#: attrib.rc:27 cmd.rc:322
+#: attrib.rc:27 cmd.rc:325
These look wrong: there i
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> This looks like a better approach, yes
Sorry, this approach doesn't work as I expected, further investigation
show that posted messages would be processed before input messages,
msdn confirms it:
--- quote ---
If no filter is specified
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> >> +#include "ddk/wdm.h"
> > Please don't do that, this breaks compilation with PSDK headers. If you need
> > some specific definitions, types or API prototypes - replicate them in the
> > test
> > itself.
> What breaks exactly? The fact that PSDK doesn't have DDK headers
