Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> It is definitely valid to call CryptDecrypt multiple times with the same
> key. Calls with Final = FALSE change the internal state of the key, calls
> with Final = TRUE restore the initial state. Subsequent calls with Final =
>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Qian Hong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Welcome again :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Tiger Soldier wrote:
>
>> This is my first time to develop WINE. Any comments/suggestions?
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17042
>
> Improving Rich Edit is great appr
It is definitely valid to call CryptDecrypt multiple times with the same
key. Calls with Final = FALSE change the internal state of the key, calls
with Final = TRUE restore the initial state. Subsequent calls with Final =
TRUE should return the same result.
Your testcase fails because CryptDecrypt
On 2013-06-26 18:14-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Note in retrospect I realized that this period leading up to the
release of Wine-1.6.0 has been a lousy time to ask wine developers
with Cygwin expertise to take on the additional distraction of getting
the debugging process for bug 24018 started wit
Hello,
I was investigating Bug 33898 [1] hardly and get a partial result, I
have a special test case demonstrate the behavior of Aliwangwang [2],
however, I failed to expand the special case to a common test case. My
attempting is shown in [3]. The hack in [3] works for Aliwangwang, but
the test c
Hi Thomas,
I tested what midl does in this case and I think the solution should be
different. When I tried to compile an empty interface, I got an error
saying that '[object] interface must derive from another [object]
interface'. That requirement is mostly enough to avoid empty vtbl.
I was wonde
