On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 23 June 2013 07:10, Austin English wrote:
>> Please consider applying before the release of 1.6. It has no
>> functional changes, but would really help when diagnosing user
>> problems.
>>
> This is not really a wined3d patch. That said,
On 2013-06-25 21:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Thomas Faber writes:
>
>> An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all,
>> and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line
>> with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case
Thomas Faber writes:
> An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all,
> and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line
> with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case results in,
> but require a slightly larger change to
Andrey Turkin has stated at
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24018 that this is really a
Cygwin bug. I frankly don't understand the technical details
but his current test (an infinite loop with Cygwin fork
calls) may need some beefing up to convince the Cygwin developers they
have introduce
Thanks Stefan!
No problem with me. I don't take it personnally. :)
I'm not statisfied with the submission/review with some criterias which are
sometimes rules, sometimes tastes, with patches (not necessarily mine) that
remain in the new state without any comments while another with a missing
dot wo
Julian Rüger writes:
> I'm unsure about the second line. Is that supposed to be the "last
> modified" date of the manpage, the wineserver or what? The English
> version says October 2005.
In general, it would be the last time there were changes to the program
that required a manpage update.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-06-25 18:08, schrieb Christian Costa:
> Are we really discussing about a typo in the subject line?
> "Implement" just comes naturally from the fixme when I create an
> empty patch. It turned out after coding that "Fix" is more
> appropriate. I
2013/6/25 Henri Verbeet
> On 25 June 2013 11:05, Christian Costa wrote:
> > 2013/6/25 Henri Verbeet
> >> At least try to pretend you put
> >> some effort into making sure the patch is as good as it can be before
> >> submitting it.
> >
> >
> > I could have send the patch to wine-devel first but
Pavel VlÄek writes:
> @@ -1415,19 +1400,19 @@
>
> #: crypt32.rc:74
> msgid "Title"
> -msgstr "Titul"
> +msgstr ""
>
> #: crypt32.rc:75
> msgid "Given Name"
> -msgstr "Jm©no"
> +msgstr ""
>
> #: crypt32.rc:76
> msgid "Initials"
> -msgstr "Inici¡ly"
> +msgstr ""
>
> #: crypt32.rc:77
On 25 June 2013 11:05, Christian Costa wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Henri Verbeet
>> At least try to pretend you put
>> some effort into making sure the patch is as good as it can be before
>> submitting it.
>
>
> I could have send the patch to wine-devel first but would I get something
> longer that "seve
2013/6/25 Henri Verbeet
> On 24 June 2013 16:44, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> > @@ -1673,6 +1673,8 @@ struct texture_stage_op
> > unsignedaarg2 : 8;
> > unsignedaarg0 : 8;
> >
> > +DWORD constant;
> > +
> > struct color_fixup_desc col
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:43:18PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/dlls/ole32/ifs.c
> > > > +++ b/dlls/ole32/ifs.c
> > > > @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ static LPVOID WINAPI IMalloc_fnRealloc(LPMALLOC
> > > > iface,LPVOID pv,DWORD cb) {
> > > > IMall
12 matches
Mail list logo
