On Wednesday 01 May 2013 10:37:38 pm Alexandre Bique wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to write a Linux VST bridge to Windows VST. This could improve
> windows VST support in our native DAW.
>
> I wonder what is the best strategy and what do you recommend?
> - spawn a wine vst host process from the linux vs
Hi,
I plan to write a Linux VST bridge to Windows VST. This could improve
windows VST support in our native DAW.
I wonder what is the best strategy and what do you recommend?
- spawn a wine vst host process from the linux vst and then do IPC
through unix socket
- spawn a wine vst host process f
Hello wine-devel!
This is my proposal as a student for Google Summer of Code 2013.
I'm George Stephanos from the "Arab Academy for Science and Technology"
situated in Egypt. gsteph on #winehackers
I'm currently about to finish my second semester as a BSc in CS.
Previous Experience:
I haven't deve
--
On Fri, May 3, 2013 00:35 BST Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST)
>Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>>
>> - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody
>> "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-he
On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST)
Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>
> - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody
> "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-heartedly
> willingly, sounds wrong.
>
Nobody's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyon
Am 01.05.2013 07:19, schrieb Brock York:
> Hey Everyone,
> I've been wanting to get into Google Summer of Code and Wine development for
> quite a while now.
> I was looking on the wine ideas page : http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode
>
> I'm interested in doing the first one: Tools - Implement ne
--- On Thu, 2/5/13, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
From: Frédéric Delanoy
Subject: Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has
maintainers
To: "Rosanne DiMesio" , "André Hentschel"
Cc: "Wine Devel"
Date: Thursday, 2 May, 2013, 18:53
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rosa
Hello,
I just tried compiling all of Wine with my patch series applied and, to my
surprise, compilation failed. The reason was that IID_IResourceManager was
already declared elsewhere.
Now, according to this page:
http://mikolajapp.appspot.com/uuid/query?q={56a868ac-0ad4-11ce-b03a-0020af0ba770}
Wi
There were already similar changes to uuid.c in the past, for example these:
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/eda7615d699eb01a73e7bf7e30b12b7e804459e5
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/97f4b22543c44216f5286eb1cd42b201d884eca5
but you have a good point. I'm adding inte
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 17:57:16 +0200
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
> >
> > This won't prevent it, but I'm not sure hiding/disabling comments won't
> do
> > more harm than good.
>
> My opinion, based on close to 5 years experience as an active Ap
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:35:28 +0200
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> > Furthermore, there's already a comment telling sthg along the lines of
> > "this program wasn't tested with a recent wine version".
> > Isn't that sufficient already?
> >
>
>
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25396
Your paranoid android
2013/5/2 Francois Gouget
> ---
> dlls/msi/tests/install.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/msi/tests/install.c b/dlls/msi/tests/install.c
> index e5d996e..0c322be 100644
> --- a/dlls/msi/tests/install.c
> +++ b/dlls/msi/tests/install.c
> @@ -3110,7
On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:35:28 +0200
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> That seems a bit harsh: you probably can't expect users to follow
> workarounds scattered across associated bugs, can you?
>
I do it every day.
> Furthermore, there's already a comment telling sthg along the lines of
> "this program w
Daniel Jeliński writes:
> From 6b7cd0b30b3eaf22d9b9bbef733163e74cc04ca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Jelinski
> Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 20:28:10 +0200
> Subject: include: add transact.h, txdtc.h and txcoord.h
>
> this time based on minGW headers. Originals found here:
> http://sourcefor
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:47:25 -0400
> Christopher Cope wrote:
>
> > I understand the premise, but I disagree. A lot of apps that I use don't
> have maintainers. However, the comments are typically helpful. I believe
> this should be approac
The way I set it was to enable with the original labels or absolute label with
relative mode. My mouse has absolute labels, but with relative mode set. My
mouse won't work correctly without this patch. Relative and absolute mode can
be set relatively easily.
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>Christo
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> #include "msdasc.h"
>
> +#include "transact.h"
> +#include "txdtc.h"
>
>
A patch only adding new headers for inclusion is likely not acceptable.
You should merge it with another patch making use of it.
Frédéric
18 matches
Mail list logo
