Sam Edwards wrote:
> This change only affects malformed fonts that have glyphs with splines
> that go above the maximum ascent as specified in the font's hhea/os2
> table. For that reason, any tests for this change would have to include
> a malformed font, so I did not write tests. If we want
I tried to make a test case now. It's tested on wine-1.5.27 since I
don't have enough battery to compile new wine.
$ winegcc test.c -o test
Issue1, the 0x40 bit:
$ ./test.exe
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00
*press LEFT arrow*
81 00 00 00
*release LEFT arrow*
01 00 00 00
*ALTTAB*
41 00 00 00
Issue2, LE
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:39:33 +0900
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> [please don't omit wine-devel when replying]
>
> Stevie Trujillo wrote:
>
> > > Stevie Trujillo wrote:
> > > > Another (minor) problem raised in the bugzilla entry is that,
> > > > if a key is pressed when changing window, and relea
With wine-1.5.20 and clang 3.2, the test suite is in the same state on my
Fedora 18 machine as gcc-4.7.2
llvm version: git-svn-id:
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@17976891177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clang version: git-svn-id:
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@1797
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:32 AM, James Eder wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:37:27PM -0600, James Eder wrote:
>> > As many of you no doubt know, GCC recently released 4.8.0. This new
>> > version introduces a new optimization
Simon Lipp writes:
> @@ -389,6 +389,10 @@ static int process_events( Display *display, Bool
> (*filter)(Display*, XEvent*,XP
> count++;
> if (XFilterEvent( &event, None ))
> {
> +KeySym keysym = 0;
> +XLookupString(&event.xkey, NULL, 0, &keysym,
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25164
Your paranoid android
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
> I still need to manually enable WXPX64 and WXPPROSP2 when I send a test
> to testbot.
I thought I had switched them to base already but maybe not. I did so
again yesterday and rechecked today and it looks like it's ok now.
--
Francois Gouget
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> I don't think converting to double is a good idea here. Why don't you do
> conversions directly to BOOL for all cases?
>
My fisrt thought on this is to convert all type to double, and then at last
I just do one-time comparision, to avoid
On 04/18/13 12:06, larmbr zhan wrote:
>> You're going to have to be (much) more specific with your application, what
>> modules do you plan to implement, what applications does this help (if you
>> know of any), etc.
> Actually I am a huge fan of underlying stuff like OS, programming
> language int
On 04/17/13 18:18, larmbr zhan wrote:
> +double tmp;
> +WCHAR trueW[] = {'T','r','u','e','\0'};
> +WCHAR falseW[] = {'F','a','l','s','e','\0'};
> +
> +TRACE("%s\n", debugstr_variant(arg));
> +
> +assert(args_cnt == 1);
> +
> +switch(V_VT(arg)) {
> +case VT_I2:
> +
On 04/17/13 18:17, larmbr zhan wrote:
> +static HRESULT to_int_banker_rounding(VARIANT *v, int *ret)
> +{
I wonder if this conversion is used in any other place as well. I think
this does not need a helper function until we find other use cases as
well, esp. since you could simplify that to:
if(V
On 04/17/13 18:38, larmbr zhan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a junior student from a non-famous college,
> I apply to parcitipate in GSoC , to help do some
> vbscript module implementation. I've just submitted
> a patchset on this.
No worries, no collage name can give you as much as a patch. That's a
Hi, Austin.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Austin English wrote:
> While your college may not be famous, it's still nice information to have
> (and let's us get to know you better).
Well, I am a student from Defence Industry Staff College of GuangDong, China,
and major in electric automatizati
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Under Windows removable drives (USB sticks) can have drive letters such
> as J: or K:.
They are not considered floppy devices though.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25160
Your paranoid android
Marvin wrote:
> === W2K8SE (32 bit loader) ===
> lloader.c:1686: Test failed: expected exit code 0, got 196
This patch is not supposed to change anything in test results.
Looks like a spurious test failure in the VM, and I have no idea
what version of Windows is that.
--
Dmitry.
[please don't omit wine-devel when replying]
Stevie Trujillo wrote:
> > Stevie Trujillo wrote:
> > > Another (minor) problem raised in the bugzilla entry is that, if a
> > > key is pressed when changing window, and released before returning,
> > > GetKeyboardState() will claim the key is still
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:37:27PM -0600, James Eder wrote:
> > As many of you no doubt know, GCC recently released 4.8.0. This new
> > version introduces a new optimization level enabled by -Og with the
> > following description (from th
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>
> > +LPTOP_LEVEL_EXCEPTION_FILTER
> MSVCR110__crtSetUnhandledExceptionFilter(LPTOP_LEVEL_EXCEPTION_FILTER
> filter)
> > +{
> > +return SetUnhandledExceptionFilter(filter);
> > +}
>
> msvcrt APIs need an explic
20 matches
Mail list logo
