Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24535
Your paranoid android
Hi Nozomi,
this is pretty fast. Just some numbers (run time on my machine, so it
might not be that representative)...
before: 43s
previous patch: 27s
this patch: 21s
native: 16s
So from the speed point of view, it's a lot closer than the rest.
Though, I would split this into 2 patches, one f
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:42:14 +0900, Byeongsik Jeon wrote:
> > This condition should be rewritten. buf is not initialized when
> > RegQueryValueExA is failed in line 3542. And strcmp(buf, cpbuf) has
> > already done in line 3544.
> >
> I wanted to update in registry when codepages changed, not logp
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> This patch is marked as 'Rejected', and I can't find an e-mail to wine-devel
> with an explanation why.
It's a matter of taste, so you can't change other people's code.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:08:02AM +0100, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 25 February 2013 10:24, Rico Sch?ller wrote:
> > I did some small tests for speed with the following results. You may also
> > avoid such a lot of variable assignments like *pout = out and you may use 4
> > vecs instead. This shou
