Re: user32/tests: Test invalidating during SetWindowPos() (resend).

2013-02-24 Thread Sergey Guralnik
On 2013-02-21 15:44, Sergey Guralnik wrote: This patch marked as "Pending" without any comment at wine-devel. Is something wrong with it? (Maybe there should be more test cases?) -- Sergey

Re: [1/3] gdiplus: Add some tests for ARGB conversions.

2013-02-24 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/25/2013 09:29, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: It seems your system time is an hour ahead. Probably old timezone info?

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-24 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 02/24/2013 04:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: By the way, do you see something broken or it's just something you want to work on? Partly broken. If fed a bad string, it sometimes blows up and sometimes returns an error code. The 'real' routine also blows up on some strings. Which strings depe

Re: Why complain about X1R5G5B5?

2013-02-24 Thread Francois Gouget
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Henri Verbeet wrote: > On 23 February 2013 17:20, Henri Verbeet wrote: > > Personally, I suspect the test is just overly restrictive. > > Also, just to clarify something, initially on IRC I was under the > impression the driver *only* exposed X1R5G5B5, i.e. instead of > X8R8

Re: comctl32/listview: fix mouse message sequences

2013-02-24 Thread Daniel Jelinski
2013/2/24 Nikolay Sivov : > This doesn't look very clean. I mean invoking *up handler from a *down one. > Is this something that could be resolved with message loop like rbutton > dragging was fixed? TrackMouse contains the message loop. It returns FALSE when it receives LBUTTONUP (or any other bu

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-24 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/24/2013 15:13, Eric Pouech wrote: Le 24/02/2013 10:18, Nikolay Sivov a écrit : On 2/24/2013 10:07, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: On 02/23/2013 02:54 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: Le 21/02/2013 14:33, Max TenEyck Woodbury a écrit : Would it be appropriate to add a test to the name demangler that:

Re: comctl32/listview: fix mouse message sequences

2013-02-24 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/24/2013 01:33, Daniel Jelinski wrote: @@ -10178,6 +10139,19 @@ static LRESULT LISTVIEW_LButtonDown(LISTVIEW_INFO *infoPtr, WORD wKey, INT x, IN if (infoPtr->dwLvExStyle & LVS_EX_ONECLICKACTIVATE) if(lvHitTestInfo.iItem != -1) notify_itemactivate(infoPtr,&lvHitTestInfo);

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-24 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 2/24/2013 10:07, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote: On 02/23/2013 02:54 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: Le 21/02/2013 14:33, Max TenEyck Woodbury a écrit : Would it be appropriate to add a test to the name demangler that: 1) Scans all '.dll' and '.spec' files for mangled names, and 2) Tries to decode thos

Re: A new demangler test?

2013-02-24 Thread Eric Pouech
Le 24/02/2013 07:07, Max TenEyck Woodbury a écrit : On 02/23/2013 02:54 AM, Eric Pouech wrote: Le 21/02/2013 14:33, Max TenEyck Woodbury a écrit : Would it be appropriate to add a test to the name demangler that: 1) Scans all '.dll' and '.spec' files for mangled names, and 2) Tries to decode