On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> Could the password hashes be excluded from the regular tarball? E.g. using
> --exclude in the tar command?
Sorry I didn't reply sooner, been a little busy the past week. I don't have a
copy of the Wine Wiki data in front of me, but if I remembe
Other than the 6/6, this series looks good to me.
Thanks for breaking this up. It makes it much easier to review.
+if (idx > -1)
+{
+VariantInit(pvarValue+i);
+res = VariantCopy(pvarValue+i, This->values+idx);
+phrError[i] = res;
+if (FAILED(res))
+break;
+}
This looks wrong to me. We have an array of error values to set f
if (This->properties[i].pstrName)
{
HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, This->properties[i].pstrName);
+VariantClear( This->values+i ); /* Not initialized if
pstrName not initialized */
}
...
{
This->properties = Heap
+if (This->properties[i].pstrName)
+{
+HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, This->properties[i].pstrName);
+}
HeapFree already checks for NULL, so there's no need for an if statement here.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24128
Your paranoid android
Daniel Jelinski writes:
> +#ifdef _WIN64
> +/* NOTE: -1 is not treated the same as (DWORD)-1 by 64bit listview */
> +ret = SendMessage(hwnd, LVM_SETICONSPACING, 0, (DWORD)-1);
> +todo_wine {
> +expect(100, LOWORD(ret));
> +expect(0x, HIWORD(ret));
> +}
> +ret = SendMessage
Forgot to add the credit for this patch series as I didn't wrote this
coccinelle script:
Found using the memcpy-assign.cocci script submitted for inclusion into
the Linux kernel:
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2013-January/000121.html
bye
michael
On 01/24/2013 02:21 PM, Michael S
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24121
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24115
Your paranoid android
Hi,
if you can, please download the test executable from
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24107
and run it on a native MS machine (32 and 64 bit).
Please send me the results, no need to post.
I particularly welcome test results from old w9k machines!
Thank you,
Jörg Höhle
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=24106
Your paranoid android
12 matches
Mail list logo