s...@das-labor.org wrote:
> OK, but how do I know that the old behavior is broken ? WindowsXp behaves
> like msdn quotes while newer windows don't. Do you always assume that the
> latest implementation is correct ? Should wine just match the latest
> test-results and ignore osversioninfo at all ?
OK, but how do I know that the old behavior is broken ? WindowsXp behaves like msdn quotes while newer windows don't. Do you always assume that the latest implementation is correct ? Should wine just match the latest test-results and ignore osversioninfo at all ?Von: "Dmitry Timoshkov" An: "Patrick
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23862
Your paranoid android
Austin English wrote:
> Try 2:
> Remove L suffixes, C++ comment.
> +/* Forward declarations */
You've copied too much from the PSDK version, better leave it to someone
else, and do it step by step when particular functionality gets implemented.
--
Dmitry.
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Changelog:
> * user32: fix non-BOOL returns in BOOL functions
GetClassInfo is special, it actually returns class atom on success,
not just a boolean value. So it's better to leave it as it is now.
--
Dmitry.
Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> try 2:
> set progress routine pointer to NULL to disable progress reporting
> test osversion and delete destination file on PROGRESS_STOP on vista
> and newer
This kind of version check is useless in Wine.
--
Dmitry.
Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> try2:
> check the os version in case of PROGRESS_STOP
> +ret = GetFileAttributesEx(dest_name, GetFileExInfoStandard,
> (void*)&fileInfo);
> +
> +/* Windows Vista and newer delete the file, while prior versions don't */
> +ok((!ret && info.dwMajorVersion > 5)
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23861
Your paranoid android
On 1/10/2013 22:35, Austin English wrote:
Some minor things.
+typedef enum D3D11_RESOURCE_DIMENSION
+{
+D3D11_RESOURCE_DIMENSION_UNKNOWN = 0,
+D3D11_RESOURCE_DIMENSION_BUFFER = 1,
+D3D11_RESOURCE_DIMENSION_TEXTURE1D = 2,
+D3D11_RESOURCE_DIMENSION_TEXTURE2D = 3,
+D3D11_RESOU
On 10.01.2013 17:13, Matteo Bruni wrote:
2013/1/10 Rico Schüller :
---
dlls/d3dx9_36/texture.c | 6 +++---
1 Datei geändert, 3 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 3 Zeilen entfernt(-
-DWORD i, v;
+DWORD i, v, mask32 = format->bits[c] == 32 ? -1 : ((1 <<
format->bits[c]) - 1);
Usually w
2013/1/10 Rico Schüller :
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/texture.c | 6 +++---
> 1 Datei geändert, 3 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 3 Zeilen entfernt(-
>
> -DWORD i, v;
> +DWORD i, v, mask32 = format->bits[c] == 32 ? -1 : ((1 <<
> format->bits[c]) - 1);
Usually we prefer to use ~0U instead of -1
2013/1/10 Johannes Kroll
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:04:02 +0100
> Christian Costa wrote:
>
> > In your code you stop checking F7 just before the last byte (until
> > position lpMidiOutHdr->dwBufferLength-2);
> > You can check the last byte as well. This is also valid and simplify the
> > condition
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:04:02 +0100
Christian Costa wrote:
> In your code you stop checking F7 just before the last byte (until
> position lpMidiOutHdr->dwBufferLength-2);
> You can check the last byte as well. This is also valid and simplify the
> condition.
> The missing F7 byte case is handled
Hi,
please don't apply this patch. There are several other occurrences in
the same file. I'll send an improved version.
Cheers
Rico
On 10.01.2013 13:55, Rico Schüller wrote:
Hi,
this patch removes useless shifts, which may result in wrong data when
the shift is bigger than 24.
Cheers
Rico
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23848
Your paranoid android
2013/1/10 Johannes Kroll
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:05:28 +0100
> Johannes Kroll wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:38:06 +0100
> > Christian Costa wrote:
> >
> >
> > > After a better look the changes seem correct.
> > > The condition i < lpMidioutHdr->dwBufferLength-1 is not necessary
> tough.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23842
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23834
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23840
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23838
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23841
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23836
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23835
Your paranoid android
Hello!
I've tried editing wine FAQ and several other wiki pages, but failed. When
I click on "Preview" or "Save" buttons, I always see error message like
[Errno 31] Too many links:
'/var/www/wine/wiki/data/pages/AlexeiRomanoff(2f)MoinEditorBackup'
If you want to report a bug, please save this pa
24 matches
Mail list logo