On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:03:31PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 31-12-12 17:59, Andrew Eikum schreef:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 01:24:03AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> + if(!maxq){
> >> + /* nothing to do! */
> >> + LeaveCriticalSection(&device->mixlock);
> >> +
> I also unsubscribed and subscribed again to the wine-patches list.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Has wine-patches a whitelist?
We use an exim rule to screen out IP addresses flagged in the SORBS
database.
Unfortunately, the outbound mailer for your domain is listed; here is
the exim error report:
212.2
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 01:24:03AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> + if(!maxq){
> + /* nothing to do! */
> + LeaveCriticalSection(&device->mixlock);
> + return;
> }
This was removed in 8ba4090fc304993. It breaks starting the device in
some situations
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23671
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23671
Your paranoid android
Le 30/12/2012 22:52, Adam Martinson a écrit :
Looking for some help splitting patch 3, not sure how I can cut it
down any more without breaking stuff. I'm guessing patch 9 will need
splitting too, same problem.
I haven't checked whether it's really possible, but one way to go would
be to:
-
