On 12/30/2012 00:58, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:02:34AM +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 12/29/2012 23:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
From: Marcus Meissner
Modeled pretty much after the implementation described
in glibc/nptl/DESIGN-condvar.txt with its futex usage
sofar repla
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:02:34AM +0400, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 12/29/2012 23:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> >From: Marcus Meissner
> >
> >Modeled pretty much after the implementation described
> >in glibc/nptl/DESIGN-condvar.txt with its futex usage
> >sofar replaced by regular Win32 Semaphores
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23659
Your paranoid android
On 12/29/2012 23:04, Marcus Meissner wrote:
From: Marcus Meissner
Modeled pretty much after the implementation described
in glibc/nptl/DESIGN-condvar.txt with its futex usage
sofar replaced by regular Win32 Semaphores.
An additional futex implementation is possible.
I *think* I have the seman
