I had a look at a couple warnings, e.g.
file:///home/dank/Downloads/scan-build-2012-12-18-1/report-z07lcL.html#EndPath
file:///home/dank/Downloads/scan-build-2012-12-18-1/report-9D2p5I.html#EndPath
They're hard to follow, but mostly look like garbage :-( Too bad
there's no web interface for marki
Hi,
Maarten Lankhorst answered:
>> [...] I wonder why you
>> insist on using GetStreamLatency as the basis of your timeout
>> computations instead of GetDevicePeriod.
>Because I'm using it later on in the rework to tell how much to queue.
Ah. But why not use the correct tool for the correct job
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Hamid Lohar wrote:
> I am installing it from source file (wine 1.5.x.tar.bz2) by running
> wine install i get error "x support not found, wine can not fount x,
> please instal xlib/xfree86 devlopment files".
> That is the error.
>
You need to install your X develop
Jérôme Gardou writes:
> ---
> dlls/msvcrt/process.c |8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
You should also fix the corresponding headers and remove the typecasts.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23578
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23573
Your paranoid android
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Actually I did that, but then tested under Russian Windows7 and it's 'dpi'
> there, so I'd assume that it's either considered as a common term, or it's
> driver dependent (although all remaining driver UIs are in Russian here).
> If you still think that it should be tra
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > @@ -224,10 +229,13 @@ typedef struct
> > static INT_PTR CALLBACK PSDRV_PaperDlgProc(HWND hwnd, UINT msg,
> > WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
> > {
> > + static const WCHAR resW[] = {'%','d',' ','d','p','i',0};
> > + stati
Charles Davis writes:
> This prevents Clang from optimizing the loop into a memset(3) call.
Something like -fno-builtin would be preferable.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> @@ -224,10 +229,13 @@ typedef struct
> static INT_PTR CALLBACK PSDRV_PaperDlgProc(HWND hwnd, UINT msg,
> WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
> {
> + static const WCHAR resW[] = {'%','d',' ','d','p','i',0};
> + static const WCHAR
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:34 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-12-12 14:28, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Actually in winepulse, sleep / 12000 (8 ms I guess?) ms would work, no
> >> sleep at all works too,
> > Yes, I wanted to go no fu
Op 04-12-12 14:28, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
> Hi,
>
> Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Actually in winepulse, sleep / 12000 (8 ms I guess?) ms would work, no sleep
>> at all works too,
> Yes, I wanted to go no further than 8ms below the 10ms period limit.
>
>> it was just the mixing of
Maarten,
> +hres = IAudioClient_GetStreamLatency(device->client, &period);
> +device->sleeptime = period_ms * 5 / 2;
> + ret = WaitForSingleObject(dev->sleepev, dev->sleeptime);
Although it's a minor point, as we're solely discussing the case of the
timeout when mmdevapi d
Andrew Eikum asked:
>Is it true that SetEvent() causes a context switch?
Looking at +tid log files, I've seen switches happen after SetEvent
often enough. That motivated some changes to winmm notification in
the last years, i.e. call SetEvent after all local work is finished
and objects are in a
14 matches
Mail list logo
