Sorry, I should have labelled this patch as "Try 2".
--
Andy.
Forgot to include list somehow...
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> My main reason for using it is to test the Mac builds before pushing
> commits, so not being able to build the Mac driver on it is a serious
> problem (and no, it can't be upgraded apparently).
I'll
Akihiro Sagawa writes:
> @@ -5866,10 +5867,22 @@ static DWORD get_glyph_outline(GdiFont
> *incoming_font, UINT glyph, UINT format,
> return GDI_ERROR;
> }
>
> +if (!font->orientation) {
> +TEXTMETRICW tm;
> +double advance = (ft_face->glyph->metrics.horiAdvanc
Looks good to me, no problems with any of the drivers. I think it'd be
good to get it in on Monday, as release day is tomorrow, but that's
not my call.
Andrew
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:30:04AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Use a thread instead of a timer for greater precision.
>
> Changes s
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> There are 9 elements of 2 bytes in size each, 18 bytes in total,
> the compiler will align this structure to 4 bytes, making its
> size 20 bytes.
No it won't.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:26:36PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
> > The size is irrelevant - it's variable sized anyway. We just care
> > about the offsets of the elements.
>
> Anyway, in order to avoid any confusion or bugs in future with allocating
> an array of such stru
Huw Davies wrote:
> > There are 9 elements of 2 bytes in size each, 18 bytes in total,
> > the compiler will align this structure to 4 bytes, making its
> > size 20 bytes.
>
> The size is irrelevant - it's variable sized anyway. We just care
> about the offsets of the elements.
Anyway, in orde
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05:48PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
>
> > > > typedef struct {
> > > > +WORD PosFormat;
> > > > +WORD Coverage;
> > > > +WORD ValueFormat1;
> > > > +WORD ValueFormat2;
> > > > +WORD ClassDef1;
> > > > +WORD ClassDef2;
> >
Huw Davies wrote:
> > > typedef struct {
> > > +WORD PosFormat;
> > > +WORD Coverage;
> > > +WORD ValueFormat1;
> > > +WORD ValueFormat2;
> > > +WORD ClassDef1;
> > > +WORD ClassDef2;
> > > +WORD Class1Count;
> > > +WORD Class2Count;
> > > +WORD Class1Record[1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:12:38PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Huw Davies wrote:
>
> > typedef struct {
> > +WORD PosFormat;
> > +WORD Coverage;
> > +WORD ValueFormat1;
> > +WORD ValueFormat2;
> > +WORD ClassDef1;
> > +WORD ClassDef2;
> > +WORD Class1Count;
> > +
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 02:03:06PM +0100, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> what's up with this patch?
>
> I wrote:
> >SetEvent is one of those calls with a high probability that the
> >Linux scheduler will switch to another thread, e.g. the one receiving
> >the event. As the critical se
Huw Davies wrote:
> typedef struct {
> +WORD PosFormat;
> +WORD Coverage;
> +WORD ValueFormat1;
> +WORD ValueFormat2;
> +WORD ClassDef1;
> +WORD ClassDef2;
> +WORD Class1Count;
> +WORD Class2Count;
> +WORD Class1Record[1];
> +} GPOS_PairPosFormat2;
Shouldn't
Hi,
what's up with this patch?
I wrote:
>SetEvent is one of those calls with a high probability that the
>Linux scheduler will switch to another thread, e.g. the one receiving
>the event. As the critical section is still hold, it'll prevent the
>receiver from invoking mmdevapi, e.g. GetCurrentPa
Hi Nikolay,
On 12/20/12 11:29, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 17:22, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> On 12/19/12 08:24, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
>>> Add custom handling for DISPID_VALUE for node map
>> If this has to be done for all IDispatchEx objects with DISPID_VALUE, it
>> may be worth considering cha
On 12/20/2012 14:50, Tatyana Fokina wrote:
Hi, Tatyana.
Main problem is that your test will crash if run without patch 2/2,
that's not how it should be done.
You need to merge these patches together to keep tests working or send
implementation fix first,
so next test patch will work.
+h
Andrew Talbot writes:
> Changelog:
> oleaut32: Indentation Fix.
Please avoid reformatting hundreds of lines for no reason. Only fix the
parts where the indentation is actually incorrect.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On 12/19/2012 17:22, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 12/19/12 08:24, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Add custom handling for DISPID_VALUE for node map
If this has to be done for all IDispatchEx objects with DISPID_VALUE, it
may be worth considering changing dispex.c. Something like:
if(id == DISPID_VALUE && wFlags
17 matches
Mail list logo