Re: [PATCH] gdi32: Don't enumerate fonts when OpenFontFace fails (try 2).

2012-12-07 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Qian Hong writes: > IMO the best solution is to correctly implement RemoveFontResource() > so Bug 8292 will be fixed, then we don't need to worry about the > broken test in usp10, which is the original reason for this patch. > > Would you like me send this patch which is still an improvement, or

Re: [PATCH] gdi32: Don't enumerate fonts when OpenFontFace fails (try 2).

2012-12-07 Thread Qian Hong
Hello, On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdiplus.dll -T ../../.. -p > gdiplus_test.exe.so font.c && touch font.ok > font.c:400: Test failed: Expected 0, got 3 > font.c:401: Test failed: got NULL font collection > make[1]: *** [font.

Re: Need help to install Xlib/xfree86 devlopnemt packeg in ubuntu 10 LTS

2012-12-07 Thread Frédéric Delanoy
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Hamid Lohar wrote: > Dear sir, > I am installing wine 1.3 from source file but i getting fail to > install beacose of Xlib/xfree86 devlopnemt packeg so i neet that > packege please help me. >> You don't provide enough information about your issue: what's the erro

Re: [PATCH 2/3] msxml3: Added URL validation tests

2012-12-07 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23266 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/3] msxml3: Tests code clean up

2012-12-07 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23267 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add O_DENY* flags to fcntl and cifs

2012-12-07 Thread Pavel Shilovsky
2012/12/6 Pavel Shilovsky : > Network filesystems CIFS, SMB2.0, SMB3.0 and NFSv4 have such flags - this > change can benefit cifs and nfs modules. While this change is ok for network > filesystems, itsn't not targeted for local filesystems due security problems > (e.g. when a user process can de