Qian Hong writes:
> IMO the best solution is to correctly implement RemoveFontResource()
> so Bug 8292 will be fixed, then we don't need to worry about the
> broken test in usp10, which is the original reason for this patch.
>
> Would you like me send this patch which is still an improvement, or
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdiplus.dll -T ../../.. -p
> gdiplus_test.exe.so font.c && touch font.ok
> font.c:400: Test failed: Expected 0, got 3
> font.c:401: Test failed: got NULL font collection
> make[1]: *** [font.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Hamid Lohar wrote:
> Dear sir,
> I am installing wine 1.3 from source file but i getting fail to
> install beacose of Xlib/xfree86 devlopnemt packeg so i neet that
> packege please help me.
>>
You don't provide enough information about your issue: what's the
erro
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23266
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=23267
Your paranoid android
2012/12/6 Pavel Shilovsky :
> Network filesystems CIFS, SMB2.0, SMB3.0 and NFSv4 have such flags - this
> change can benefit cifs and nfs modules. While this change is ok for network
> filesystems, itsn't not targeted for local filesystems due security problems
> (e.g. when a user process can de