Hello
Is there a status update on this patch? I am curious to know if it
will be merged, and if not, what correction is needed to make it
mergeable.
Thanks
Jeff
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Adam Jakubek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Stefan Dösinger
> wrote:
>>
>> I skimmed bug #1
Wednesday 14 November 2012 Hans Leidekker
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 16:28 +0100, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > @@ -2053,6 +2053,8 @@ static BOOL cred_decode( const WCHAR *cred,
> > unsigned int len, char *buf )
> >
> > char c0, c1, c2, c3;
> > const WCHAR *p = cred;
> >
> > +TRACE("%s\n
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 16:28 +0100, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> @@ -2053,6 +2053,8 @@ static BOOL cred_decode( const WCHAR *cred, unsigned
> int len, char *buf )
> char c0, c1, c2, c3;
> const WCHAR *p = cred;
>
> +TRACE("%s\n", debugstr_wn(cred,len));
This string is already traced i
Wednesday 14 November 2012 Hans Leidekker
> On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 09:48 +0100, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > +char buffer[6];
> > +unsigned int buflen, *size = (unsigned int*) buffer;
> >
> > -if (len < 9 || !cred_decode( cred + 3, 6, (char *)&size ) ||
> > !size || size % si
On 11/14/2012 10:15 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
>> Would calculating the total number of 'row' calls and reading each row
>> as a 'block in turn be an alternate implementation?
>
> No, your terminology (what is a "row" in PNG?) shows lack of undertsanding
> of wha
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> Would calculating the total number of 'row' calls and reading each row
> as a 'block in turn be an alternate implementation?
No, your terminology (what is a "row" in PNG?) shows lack of undertsanding
of what is a block, or what that APIs are supposed to return. Star
On 11/14/2012 09:38 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
>>>
>>> Looks like you don't unde
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> >> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
> >> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
> >
> > Looks like you don't understand what those APIs do. What's that 'the whole
>
On 11/14/2012 07:03 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
>
>> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
>>
>> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
>> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
>
> Looks like you don't understand what
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
> These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
>
> Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
> indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
Looks like you don't understand what those APIs do. What's that 'the whole
thing'?
--
Dmitry.
These are currently returning 'not implemented'.
Would it make sense to have 'GetCount' always return '1' and have the
indexed read simply read in the whole thing?
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 09:48 +0100, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> +char buffer[6];
> +unsigned int buflen, *size = (unsigned int*) buffer;
>
> -if (len < 9 || !cred_decode( cred + 3, 6, (char *)&size ) || !size
> || size % sizeof(WCHAR))
> +if (len < 9 || !cred_decode(
* On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> The workstation service might not running
>
> http://test.winehq.org/data/b5d96da32f955357b7d9341ee9fca68108078dce/xp_s2-sp2-nosnd/netapi32:wksta.html
Indeed it isn't. I've disabled serveral services on this box.
> --- a/dlls/netapi32/tests/wks
13 matches
Mail list logo
