Le 13/11/2012 23:07, Marvin a écrit :
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDet
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22927
Your paranoid android
Hello,
Thanks for comment too!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> I think it's better to avoid macros if possible.
>>
Got it.
>> +if (!sc->sfnt)
>> +{
>> +if (GetTextMetricsW(hdc, &tmW))
>> +sc->sfp.wgBlank = tmW.tmBreakChar;
>> +else
>>
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> There's no reason to add #defines for that kind of thing, just put the
> values in the string directly.
Thanks for comment, will remove these #defines.
--
Regards,
Qian Hong
-
Sent from Ubuntu
http://www.ubuntu.com/
On 11/13/2012 18:20, Qian Hong wrote:
Thanks Aric!
---
dlls/usp10/usp10.c | 133 +--
dlls/usp10/usp10_internal.h |1 +
2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
I think it's better to avoid macros if possible.
+if (!sc->sfn
Qian Hong writes:
> +static inline void set_cache_invalid_char(const HDC hdc, ScriptCache *sc)
> +{
> +#define Zero_width_space 0x200b /* Zero Width Space */
> +#define Invalid_char3 0xf71b /* Unknow, found by black box testing */
> +#define NON_EXIST_INDEX 0x /* Default non exist char in
Francois Gouget writes:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> In theory yes, but that would have to be auto-generated. In practice
>> only strmbase should matter.
>
> I'm not sure how to auto-generate it. Would something that looks like
> this be ok:
>
> In Makefile.in:
>
> STATICI
Hey,
Op 19-10-12 15:29, Andrew Eikum schreef:
> Patches 1 and 2 in this series look fine.
>
> I have a series of patches similar to this one in my dsound
> multichannel branch. This patch seems to do too much at once.
>
> When I did this cleanup, I split it up into four patches:
> 1) Allocate the
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
[...]
> > Would somthing like the patch below be acceptable?
> > Should it be generalized to all the dependencies on uuid, dxguid, etc?
>
> In theory yes, but that would have to be auto-generated. In practice
> only strmbase should matter.
I'm not su
Piotr Caban writes:
> On 11/13/12 13:10, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>> Piotr Caban wrote:
>>
>>>create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.sfd
>>>create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.ttf
>>
>> Is it possible to add the desired glyph to an already existing test
On 11/13/12 13:10, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Piotr Caban wrote:
create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.sfd
create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.ttf
Is it possible to add the desired glyph to an already existing test font?
Yes, I was adding it first to w
Piotr Caban wrote:
> create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.sfd
> create mode 100644 dlls/gdi32/tests/test_empty_contour.ttf
Is it possible to add the desired glyph to an already existing test font?
--
Dmitry.
> I tested the following
> HANDLE hConRW = CreateFileA("CONIN$"
> , GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
> FILE_SHARE_READ, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING,
> FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, 0);
> if (hConRW == INVALID_H
Marcus Meissner writes:
> A failing here will free the netconn structure and we should
> not use it afterwards.
It probably shouldn't free it, this can break in other places too.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
14 matches
Mail list logo