On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Auble wrote:
> I'm just wondering is assembly definitely needed?
> This is just based on some googling and skimming
> through StackOverflow, but it sounds like you can
> still use va_list on amd64. It just takes some
> tweaking:
> http://stackoverflow.com/quest
On 10/03/2012 09:49 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The main challenge was figuring out how to get the variable
> list of arguments off the stack, and then put them back onto
> the stack when calling the provided function pointer.
> This bit of varargs hackery can't be done in pure C as far as I
> can tell
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22013
Your paranoid android
On 10/04/12 15:02, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/
Henri Verbeet wrote:
> -if (style & WS_MAXIMIZE)
> +if ((style & WS_MAXIMIZE) && (style & WS_CAPTION) == WS_CAPTION)
Probably you should test for WS_MAXIMIZEBOX instead.
--
Dmitry.
2012/10/4 Thomas Faber
> On 2012-10-04 13:07, Christian Costa wrote:
> > 2012/10/4 Paul Chitescu
> >> AFAIK the structure differs for each major version of Windows and some
> SP
> >> too.
> >>
> >>
> > I was expecting something like this. :(
> >
> >
> >> At the minimum I saw some drivers expecti
On 2012-10-04 13:07, Christian Costa wrote:
> 2012/10/4 Paul Chitescu
>> AFAIK the structure differs for each major version of Windows and some SP
>> too.
>>
>>
> I was expecting something like this. :(
>
>
>> At the minimum I saw some drivers expecting that at the returned pointer
>> to be
>> a
2012/10/4 Paul Chitescu
> On Thursday 04 October 2012 08:25:13 am Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Christian Costa wrote:
> > > PEPROCESS WINAPI IoGetCurrentProcess(void)
> > > {
> > > -FIXME("() stub\n");
> > > -return NULL;
> > > +TRACE("()\n");
> > > +
> > > +/* Return current pr
On 10/04/12 08:03, Mieczyslaw Nalewaj wrote:
> +static BOOL strings_equal(LPWSTR lpString1, const WCHAR *lpString2)
> +{
> +int cchCount;
Please avoid Hungarian style variable names. Also is seems like the
function not exactly compares strings, so something like is_subkey could
be more appropr
On Thursday 04 October 2012 08:25:13 am Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Christian Costa wrote:
> > PEPROCESS WINAPI IoGetCurrentProcess(void)
> > {
> > -FIXME("() stub\n");
> > -return NULL;
> > +TRACE("()\n");
> > +
> > +/* Return current process id since PEPROCESS is opaque and drive
André Hentschel writes:
> @@ -5173,10 +5173,10 @@ const struct builtin_class_descr EDIT_builtin_class =
> editW,/* name */
> CS_DBLCLKS | CS_PARENTDC, /* style */
> WINPROC_EDIT, /* proc */
> -#ifdef __i386__
> -sizeof(EDITSTATE *) + sizeof(WORD), /* e
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> I just tested with japanese locale, I don't have a localized japanese
> Windows here.
Hello,
Now I tested on my Chinese Windows, change the locale to Japanese as
the steps from
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Cha
Le 04/10/2012 07:28, Dmitry Timoshkov a écrit :
Christian Costa wrote:
+/* Read memory from the client process memory */
+if (!ReadProcessMemory(process, (LPCVOID)((ULONG)(mdl->StartVa) + mdl->ByteOffset),
(LPVOID)(((ULONG)mdl->MappedSystemVa) + mdl->ByteOffset), mdl->ByteCount, &byte
Qian Hong wrote:
> What version of Japanese Windows did you test last time?
I just tested with japanese locale, I don't have a localized japanese
Windows here.
--
Dmitry.
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> I wouldn't pay too much attention to the XP results, what about results
> on newer Windows versions?
I don't have Japanese version of Vista or Win7, there seems no
Japanese Vista or Japanese Win7 in our winehq testbots.
I tested on
Qian Hong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > On what system do you see broken results? I'm asking because i did run
> > this test with japanese locale at the time I touched it last time.
>
> Please see https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21902#k207 (
>
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> On what system do you see broken results? I'm asking because i did run
> this test with japanese locale at the time I touched it last time.
Please see https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21902#k207 (
WXPPROJASP3 )
Thanks!
Qian Hong wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 16
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On what system do you see broken results? I'm asking because i did run
this test with japanese locale at the time I touched it last time.
--
Dmitry.
18 matches
Mail list logo
