Le 02/10/2012 00:26, André Hentschel a écrit :
Am 02.10.2012 00:10, schrieb Christian Costa:
This is needed by prosync1.sys (StarForce protection) used in Obscure.
---
configure | 284 +--
configure.ac|1
Am 02.10.2012 00:10, schrieb Christian Costa:
> This is needed by prosync1.sys (StarForce protection) used in Obscure.
> ---
> configure | 284
> +--
> configure.ac|1
> dlls/scsiport.sys/Makefile.in |
Since I messed up the 0.0.6 release, here's another one, almost identical.
The source tarball is at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wine/files/Wine%20Mono/0.0.8/wine-mono-0.0.8.tar.gz/download
The binary is at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/wine/files/Wine%20Mono/0.0.8/wine-mono-0.0.8.msi/downlo
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -TRACE("socket: %04lx, ptr %p, len %8x\n", s, name, *namelen);
>> +TRACE("socket: %04lx, ptr %p, len %08x\n", s, name, namelen?*namelen:0);
>
> Adding some spaces to make this slightly mo
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21929
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21928
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21927
Your paranoid android
Hi,
On 10/01/12 13:07, Julian Rüger wrote:
Hi Francois,
- * size [I] How much percent of cache space should be free.
+ * size [I] How many percents of the cache should be free.
Maybe something like "Precentage of cache that should be free" would
sound more natural. Howe
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21919
Your paranoid android
Hi Francois,
> - * size [I] How much percent of cache space should be free.
> + * size [I] How many percents of the cache should be free.
Maybe something like "Precentage of cache that should be free" would
sound more natural. However I'm not sure of the intended meaning her
Hi Marcus,
On 09/29/12 11:44, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Various coverity issues complain about user-after-free scenarios,
> all involving this code path.
>
> I strongly think if call_ret signals error, we also need to return
> an error condition to avoid the callers from proceeding as if no
On 10/1/2012 11:14, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
On 09/30/12 20:36, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31835
The code may be simple and obvious, but I'd still like to see a test. A
simple call should be enough just to make sure it's executed when I test
new Gecko bui
Hi Nikolay,
On 09/30/12 20:36, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31835
The code may be simple and obvious, but I'd still like to see a test. A
simple call should be enough just to make sure it's executed when I test
new Gecko builds.
Jacek
On 01.10.2012 03:28, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
+for (order = 0; order <= D3DXSH_MAXORDER + 1 ; order++)
Well, I'm not sure what you are doing with the spaces ...
I say it again, if you got a comment, read it carefully take a look at
your code and fix it. I mentioned white space issues a couple
On 01.10.2012 03:27, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
I used FLOAT * WINAPI, though I don't like it.
Yeah, that's not much of an issue... and this is not the showstopper.
+TRACE("(out %p, a %p, b %p)\n", out, a, b);
What I'm a bit curious about is, why do you reinvent a new style in a
new patch (see
15 matches
Mail list logo