On 26.09.2012 19:09, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
>> +D3DXSHMultiply4(c, a, b);
>>What happens if you use something like D3DXSHMultiply4(c, c, c). Is
that allowed?
Tests in native show that D3DXSHMultiply gives what I implemented.
We can not reuse a input variable as output (we don't obtain what w
>On 26.09.2012 12:17, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
>> + ta =0.28209479f * a[0]+ 0.14567312f * a[8]+ 0.12615663f * a[6];
>> + tb =0.28209479f * b[0]+ 0.14567312f * b[8]+ 0.12615663f * b[6];
>> + out[13] += ta * b[13] + tb * a[13];
<> + t = a[13] * b[13];
>> + out[0] +=0.28209479f *t;
>Pleas
Alistair Leslie-Hughes writes:
> Changelog:
> oledb32: Add support for IDBInitialize interface in IDataInitialize
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M oledb32.dll -T ../../.. -p
oledb32_test.exe.so database.c && touch database.ok
database.c:43: Test failed: Unable to
Ok I will continue my investigates and try to resolve this or at least generate
good test cases.
This would also be easier with the thread work with user handles that I have
needed in imm32 for longer than I remember the details about. :)
But they relate to patches
8d12fc61d5321350ad63b173bdfb5
Aric Stewart writes:
> Do you want to delay on this fix until I figure our what should be
> happening with IMMGWL_IMC. Or I can have a second patch addressing
> IMMGWL_IMC and how that is suppose to be handled.
I think a few more test cases would be a good idea at this point.
--
Alexandre Jull
On 9/26/12 10:18 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Aric Stewart writes:
>
>> -if (data->imeWnd == NULL)
>> +if (defWnd == NULL)
>> {
>> /* create the ime window */
>> -data->imeWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW,
>> +defWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLW
Aric Stewart writes:
> -if (data->imeWnd == NULL)
> +if (defWnd == NULL)
> {
> /* create the ime window */
> -data->imeWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW,
> +defWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW,
> data->immKbd->imeClassName, N
On 9/26/12 7:27 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Aric Stewart writes:
>
>> This corrects issues with applications that create and manage multiple IMCs
>> try 2:
>> avoid premature destruction of the window
>> ---
>> dlls/imm32/imm.c | 22 --
>> dlls/imm32/tests/i
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21824
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21823
Your paranoid android
Aric Stewart writes:
> This corrects issues with applications that create and manage multiple IMCs
> try 2:
> avoid premature destruction of the window
> ---
> dlls/imm32/imm.c | 22 --
> dlls/imm32/tests/imm32.c | 28
> 2 files change
On 26.09.2012 12:17, Nozomi Kodama wrote:
+ta =0.28209479f * a[0]+ 0.14567312f * a[8]+ 0.12615663f * a[6];
+tb =0.28209479f * b[0]+ 0.14567312f * b[8]+ 0.12615663f * b[6];
+out[13] += ta * b[13] + tb * a[13];
+t = a[13] * b[13];
+out[0] +=0.28209479f *t;
Please use spaces wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
