user32/tests: Add tests for class small icons (try 3).

There are two patches that stay at queue more than weeek, and have no comments yet: From 5c723835fb9b8b56ccaf2a22256524c84b358fe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Guralnik Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:24:56 +0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] user32/tests: Add tests for class small icons (try 3). Fr

user32/tests: Add test for SetFocus() (with few todo)(Try 2).

Alexandre Julliard writes: Not really. If you want to test purely the Wine behavior, then you shouldn't be waiting for window manager events. If the window manager is involved then you can't guarantee that a given window will always get focus. If your app breaks because the window manager do

Re: [PATCH 3/3] jscript: Added support for no new line between return and expression rule

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21637 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/6] vbscript: Added support for do..loop statement without an expression

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21628 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/6] vbscript: Fixed parsing if statements with empty body

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21626 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 2/6] vbscript: Added Len implementation

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21627 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 21/21] jscript: Pack jsval_t to 64-bit structure on i386

Hi Juan, On 09/17/12 22:42, Juan Lang wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > + * that NaN value representation has 52 (almost) free bytes. > > You mean bits, yes? Yes, of course. > While you're at it, > + * jsval_t structure is used to represent JavaScript dynamicaly-typed values. > > dynamically is spelled wit

Re: [PATCH 2/2] jscript: Added support for host objects being part of scope chain

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21625 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/2] oleaut32/tests: Don't take the size of a pointer (Clang).

Hello Charles, On 09/18/2012 07:51 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > From: Charles Davis > > Contrary to what a novice C programmer might expect, when you declare an > array parameter to a function, what you actually get is a pointer. > Therefore, using sizeof() on the parameter will return the size of