This looks correct to me. Lack of shared logic and GenericTypographic
still makes me sad, but not too sad because the added logic is simple.
28.08.2012 19:50, Kyle Auble пишет
> If you're mainly noticing problems with the wiki, that may also be
> that we're using an outdated version of moinmoin. Cheer Xiao was saying
> that Moinmoin 2.0 will allow Mediawiki syntax so I'd recommend
> upgrading Moinmoin, then converting the pages to Med
* On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> >
> > > Target: i686-w64-mingw32
> ...
> > Target: i586-mingw32msvc
>
> There was the same topic brought up two years ago:
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-September/086643.
* On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
>
> > Target: i686-w64-mingw32
...
> Target: i586-mingw32msvc
There was the same topic brought up two years ago:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-September/086643.html
IIRC, MSVC and i586-mingw32msvc compilers initialize every
Tues, Aug 28, 2012 4:47 AM, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
> Now I wait an answer from Dimi Paun.
>
>
> Well, in addition, how do you think, is any necessarity there to move
> wine site and wiki from Apache to Cherokee?
While I think it's good to keep alternatives in mind as new technology
comes out, I would
On 08/28/12 12:04, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patch that when run on on the testbot, it fails on all but
> two machines.
> However when I build the exe myself and run it, it pass on all but two
> machines.
>
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21257
> http://testbot.
On 08/28/2012 04:47 AM, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
Well, in addition, how do you think, is any necessarity there to move
wine site and wiki from Apache to Cherokee?
Not going to happen anytime in the near future. I won't say never however.
-N
2012/8/28 Rico Schüller :
> +FIXME("Format conversation missing %#x -> %#x\n", src_format,
> surfdesc.Format);
I don't think that's really what we want it to say.
Erik van Pienbroek writes:
> +#if defined(HAVE_FORK) && defined(HAVE_WAITPID)
> +static UINT_PTR SHELL_try_native_execute ( const char *openCmd, const char
> *unixName )
> +{
> +UINT_PTR retval = SE_ERR_NOASSOC;
> +pid_t cpid;
> +struct stat st;
> +
> +if (stat(openCmd, &st) == -
Alexandre Goujon writes:
> Should fix bug #17037
> Now that my patch disappeared from source.winehq.org/patches, I'm resending
> it.
> Before commenting, please read the e-mail I sent in July
> (winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-July/096587.html)
The goal here is to avoid a mountmgr round-t
On 28.08.2012 10:50, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 28 August 2012 09:12, Rico Schüller wrote:
3. The wine_todo should be fixed in the test. Is there a way to disable them
to show up, when running e.g. "wine d3dx9_36_test.exe.so shader"? It's a bit
annoying when you search for your own failing tests.
Hi Qian,
$ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.6.1/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-w64-mingw32
Configured with: ../../src/configure --build=i686-linux-gnu
--prefix=/usr --includedir='/usr/include' --mandir='
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21287
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21286
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21285
Your paranoid android
Hello Alistair,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21257
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21256
I downloaded your patch from
http://testbot.winehq.org/GetFile.pl?JobKey=21257&StepKey=1 ,
compiled with i686-w64
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> I have a patch that when run on on the testbot, it fails on all but two
> machines.
> However when I build the exe myself and run it, it pass on all but two
> machines.
>
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21257
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
Hi,
I have a patch that when run on on the testbot, it fails on all but two
machines.
However when I build the exe myself and run it, it pass on all but two
machines.
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21257
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21256
Ubuntu 12.04.
Any Ideas
Finally I got an answer from Jeremy White, wine site admin:
Hi Oleg,
On 08/26/2012 08:21 AM, Oleg Yarigin wrote:
Good time of a day, Jeremy.
I write to you as to a WEB-administrator of WineHQ server about some
ideas of site functionality improvement:
1. How is about moving WineHQ Wiki on
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> >> I just did, and the behavior, though it looks wrong, is the same
> >> between builtin and native - the image is shifted by 1/2 pixel so that
> >> it's cut off at the upper-left and we have extra transparent space at
> >> the lower-right.
> >
> > With native gdiplus scen
On 28 August 2012 09:12, Rico Schüller wrote:
> 3. The wine_todo should be fixed in the test. Is there a way to disable them
> to show up, when running e.g. "wine d3dx9_36_test.exe.so shader"? It's a bit
> annoying when you search for your own failing tests. Well I could comment
> out the tests, b
Dan Kegel writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Explicit ok() calls are better than hiding them inside a macro.
>
> Uh-oh. Want me to get rid of this macro
>
> +#define CHECK_RET_ERRNO(ret, ex) \
> +do { \
> +ok(ret == ex, "ret is %d, expected %d\n", ret, ex); \
> +ok(errno
On 23.08.2012 22:58, Rico Schüller wrote:
On 23.08.2012 15:43, Józef Kucia wrote:
I would prefer you to clean it up submit it. I hope it gets committed
this time.
Ok, I'll try to clean them and send them. I will do it the safe way and
compare each handle with all handles we have. If it is slow
23 matches
Mail list logo
