> -Original Message-
> From: daniel.r.ke...@gmail.com [mailto:daniel.r.ke...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Dan Kegel
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:27 PM
> To: Daniel Lehman
> Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org
> Subject: re: msvcp90: handle npos as a len in basic_string<>::replace
>
> Daniel Lehman
Daniel Lehman wrote:
@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ basic_string_char* __thiscall
basic_string_char_replace_cstr_len(basic_string_ch
-if(off+len > this->size)
+if(off+len < off || off+len > this->size)
len = this->size-off;
Wouldn't this be more elegant:
if(num > this->size-pos)
On 07/16/2012 06:12 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
There's nothing mystic about it, but when you are changing the Mac code,
testing the build on a Mac is recommended ;-)
gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_NTSYSTEM_
-D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-ali
On 07/16/2012 09:44 AM, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
[...]
Maybe I should have mentioned it, but I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 and the
SD card is mounted automatically as soon as I put it into the slot. My
current hypothesis why the symlink in dosdevices is missing is that
the partition is added using
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20071
Your paranoid android
Alexandre Goujon writes:
> ---
> dlls/kernel32/volume.c | 13 ++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/volume.c b/dlls/kernel32/volume.c
> index 8377e41..67e2eb1 100644
> --- a/dlls/kernel32/volume.c
> +++ b/dlls/kernel32/volume.c
> @@ -14
"Erich E. Hoover" writes:
> @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@
>
> WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(htmlhelp);
>
> +#define HHWIN_PARAM_MASK
> (HHWIN_PARAM_PROPERTIES|HHWIN_PARAM_STYLES|HHWIN_PARAM_EXSTYLES|HHWIN_PARAM_RECT\
> +
> |HHWIN_PARAM_NAV_WIDTH|HHWIN_PARAM_SHOWSTATE|HHW
GOUJON Alexandre writes:
> Hi,
>
> My patch (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/88072) is marked as
> "Build failure".
> I tried with the latest (today) HEAD and I successfully applied it.
> Compilation also works for me at least on my x86 and x86_64 computers.
> Moreover, the Wine Test Bot te
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20070
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20066
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20067
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20068
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20069
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20065
Your paranoid android
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Jacek Caban wrote:
[...]
> It would probably be more appropriate to add
> assert(SUCCEEDED(hres)); after IsClassOfCategories calls, which can't fail.
Ok. Would something like this be ok? It seems like this single assert()
is enough to make gcc happy here.
commit 2c47407d6e11
On 2012-07-16 09:39, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:12:59AM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
Am 2012-07-15 22:04, schrieb GOUJON Alexandre:
Does http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/88280 solve your
GetLogicalDrives issue ?
Well yes, with the patch all the drive letters
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:12:59AM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Am 2012-07-15 22:04, schrieb GOUJON Alexandre:
> >On 07/14/2012 09:14 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>This means that the drive letter assigned for the sd card will not be
> >>returned in GetLogicalDrives(). When
17 matches
Mail list logo
