Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19988
Your paranoid android
Suresh Murty wrote:
> Sends a EM_SETSEL message after the initial text has been set.
This is wrong place for both a test and a fix. The text should be
selected on focus by a dialog control itself.
--
Dmitry.
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> Uh, this is going to cause regressions if you don't give the image a palette.
I'd like to avoid adding pixel format conversions (and new palettes) in
gdiplus, instead once this patch is committed I'm planning to make gdiplus
use WIC format converters, then missing and wid
Uh, this is going to cause regressions if you don't give the image a palette.
I have pushed my libvirt development branch to GitHub so you can see
what's brewing:
https://github.com/fgouget/winetestbot/commits/libvirt
or
git://github.com/fgouget/winetestbot.git
Note that I still rebase the libvirt branch regularly as I realize my
mistakes or want to reorganize th
Lucas Zawacki writes:
> @@ -419,14 +421,19 @@ static INT_PTR CALLBACK test_dlgproc(HWND hwnd, UINT
> msg, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM
> SendDlgItemMessageW(hwnd, IDC_TESTSELECTCOMBO,
> CB_SETCURSEL, 0, 0);
> test_handle_joychange(hwnd, data);
>
> -
On 13/07/2012 7:38 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 7/12/2012 23:35, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
On 12/07/2012 5:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
For http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9638 and similar cases
I have already submitted a patch for this
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/87925
I
On 7/12/2012 23:35, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
On 12/07/2012 5:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
For http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9638 and similar cases
I have already submitted a patch for this
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/87925
I see, and what happened then?
P.S. I didn't s
On 12/07/2012 5:02 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
For http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9638 and similar cases
I have already submitted a patch for this
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/87925
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
On 12 July 2012 18:46, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> It's not worth adding complexity to free memory, in practice the
> graphics driver is never going to be unloaded except at process exit.
>
I suppose, although I think in principle we'd also want to clean
things up when e.g. switching to virtual de
Henri Verbeet writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c
> index 83137a4..a8dccd4 100644
> --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c
> +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,12 @@ done:
> wine_tsx11_unlock();
> }
>
> +void X11DRV_XRandR_Cleanup(void)
> +{
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19971
Your paranoid android
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 15:03 +, Oleg Jakobsen wrote:
> @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ BOOL decode_streamname(LPCWSTR in, LPWSTR out)
> *out++ = mime2utf(ch&0x3f);
> count++;
> ch = mime2utf((ch>>6)&0x3f);
> + continue;
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
