Guten Abend Rosanne,
> but someone (Jeremy?) needs to correct the other page.
maybe you want to send a patch
to: WineHQ - patch
subject: [website]
This works easier.
--
Gruss von
Joerg Schiermeier
Guten Abend Rosanne,
> but someone (Jeremy?) needs to correct the other page.
maybe you want to send a patch
to: WineHQ - patch
subject: [website]
This works easier.
--
Gruss von
Joerg Schiermeier
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
>> That file does seem to be on disc, but somewhere else:
>> c:/windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/System.EnterpriseServices.Wrapper.dll
>>
>> Not sure how serious it is that that's misplaced. Have other folks seen
>> this?
>
> This
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:18:13 +0200
Schiermeier Software wrote:
> Guten Abend Rosanne,
>
> > but someone (Jeremy?) needs to correct the other page.
>
> maybe you want to send a patch
> to: WineHQ - patch
> subject: [website]
>
I'm sure it's very easy for someone who knows what they're doing.
Am 09.07.2012 16:17, schrieb Matteo Bruni:
2012/7/8 Rico Schüller:
---
dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/effect.c | 90
++
1 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi Rico,
maybe it's just me misunderstanding this, but:
+FLOAT fvalue[EFFECT_PARAME
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19865
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19864
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19863
Your paranoid android
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> ...
> How is it supposed to work? AFAICS you're destroying windows, removing
> info object from the list and forget about it. If your intention is to
> destroy these objects, then ReleaseHelpViewer seems more appropriate.
> Also moving list_remo
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 07:11:13 -0700
Dan Kegel wrote:
> No objection here. Seems like an obvious thing to do. I'll do it
> later today if nobody objects.
>
>
Thanks, Dan. I've "unstickied" the "Editing is disabled" thread and posted a
note that editing has been re-enabled.
Now, another houseke
2012/7/8 Rico Schüller :
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/effect.c | 90
> ++
> 1 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
Hi Rico,
maybe it's just me misunderstanding this, but:
+FLOAT fvalue[EFFECT_PARAMETER_VALUE_ARRAY_SIZE];
+D3DXMATRIX
On 07/09/12 02:13, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
> +case HH_CLOSE_ALL: {
> +struct list *ptr;
> +HHInfo *info;
> +
> +LIST_FOR_EACH(ptr, &window_list)
> +{
> +info = LIST_ENTRY(ptr, HHInfo, entry);
> +TRACE("Destroying window %s.\n", debugstr_w(i
On 07/05/12 18:31, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> ...
>> While it's not about this particular patch, I can see that you're
>> changing hhctrl.ocx to the point where it has an useful API (as opposed
>> to simple hh.exe-like help viewer). It is really
13 matches
Mail list logo
