Re: [1/3] user32/tests: Comment-out PostQuitMessage (causes tests skip)

2012-05-31 Thread Alexey Slepov
Guys, so how about this? diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c b/dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c index 6bd34b3..4301c8d 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c +++ b/dlls/user32/tests/dialog.c @@ -1027,9 +1027,6 @@ static INT_PTR CALLBACK DestroyOnCloseDlgWinProc (HWND hDlg, UINT uiMsg,  case WM

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 12:51 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote: If it IS optional, then there should be a clear way to REMOVE it, and while I have not looked at the situation long enough to find out how to remove it, I did not see something as obvious as an 'uninstall-mono' script. If you run "wine uninstaller"

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 06/01/2012 12:40 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > You realize that Microsoft has a legally binding irrevocable agreement > to not assert patents on .NET implementations that comply with the > standard, right? Mono falls under that. I wouldn't worry about patents > when it comes to Mono. We'

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Vincent Povirk
> If it IS optional, then there should be a clear way to REMOVE it, and > while I have not looked at the situation long enough to find out how to > remove it, I did not see something as obvious as an 'uninstall-mono' > script. If you run "wine uninstaller" and you have it installed (which you prob

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury < m...@mtew.isa-geek.net> wrote: > On 05/31/2012 11:05 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury > > mailto:m...@mtew.isa-geek.net>**> wrote: > > > > When did WINE start requiring MONO? > >

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
On 05/31/2012 11:05 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury > mailto:m...@mtew.isa-geek.net>> wrote: > > When did WINE start requiring MONO? > > I have a VERY strong DISLIKE for MONO and do NOT want it on my machines. > > Seems to be a

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Vincent Povirk
Yes, that was added in today's Git. When you do a prefix update, and a recent wine-mono (or native .NET) isn't installed, Wine will try to install it from a system location, and if that fails it will ask to download it. The wine-mono install is limited to your Wine prefix, and you don't have to hav

Judge rules: APIs can not be copyrighted.

2012-05-31 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
HiThe result from the Oracle => Google battle is good to know:http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/05/31/237208/judge-rules-apis-can-not-be-copyrighted-- By by ... Detlef  Ihr WEB.DE Postfach immer dabei: die kostenlose WEB.DE Mail App für iPhone und Android.   https://produkte.web.de/freemail_mobile_

Re: Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury < m...@mtew.isa-geek.net> wrote: > When did WINE start requiring MONO? > > I have a VERY strong DISLIKE for MONO and do NOT want it on my machines. > > Seems to be a recent addition. Is it possible to NOT use it? PLEASE! > > > First off, what

Mono?!?

2012-05-31 Thread Max TenEyck Woodbury
When did WINE start requiring MONO? I have a VERY strong DISLIKE for MONO and do NOT want it on my machines. Seems to be a recent addition. Is it possible to NOT use it? PLEASE!

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ddraw/tests: Add test_coop_level_mode_set() for older ddraw versions.

2012-05-31 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18687 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ntdll/tests: Add tests for RtlGetProductInfo [resend]

2012-05-31 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Detlef Riekenberg writes: > Clone the kernel32 tests to verify, that the NULL pointer > check is present in ntdll.dll That's not useful, it's clearly the same function, it doesn't need to be tested twice. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 1/5] win16/int21: make found filename uppercase.

2012-05-31 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Oleksij Rempel writes: > it is true, i used "char *". I just copy pasted this part from > "Convert ASCIIZ string to uppercase" in int21.c > So probably this should be fixed too. > > Or there is any way no interest to apply current patch? Only if you can show an application that depends on this.