Re: Installing 64 bit visual c++ 2010 runtime?

2012-05-17 Thread Dan Kegel
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >  wget > http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/2/3224B87F-CFA0-4E70-BDA3-3DE650EFEBA5/vcredist_x64.exe >  wine vcredist_x64 > installs fine... but only puts anything in c:\windows\syswow64, And the things it puts there are 64 bit dlls, whic

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Alexey Loukianov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 17.05.2012 17:05, Jari Vetoniemi wrote: > This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out test results that were > either done with patched wine, or some unsupported variant like POL or > such. > That's is exactly the same vision as mine: AppDB

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Alexey Loukianov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 17.05.2012 11:56, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > If this patch isn't accepted, I wonder why some entries like those for > Diablo III were accepted, since some indicate you need to apply some > patches. e.g. > http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sCla

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Rosanne DiMesio
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:05:35 +0300 Jari Vetoniemi wrote: > http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=24699&iTestingId=70104 > The above example shows only the results from, > unpatched wine. While the howto section informs > about patch that can potentially solve all issues, >

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Jari Vetoniemi
I think the test results should be only from vanilla wine. While the additional information which can be provided, should be used to inform about patches and their affection to the particular application with wine. This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out test results that were either

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Rosanne DiMesio
On Thu, 17 May 2012 09:56:17 +0200 Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > > If this patch isn't accepted, I wonder why some entries like those for > Diablo III were accepted, since some indicate you need to apply some > patches. > e.g. > http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=25953&iTe

Re: comctl32: When created with TCS_VERTICAL, TCS_MULTILINE is set automatically

2012-05-17 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 5/17/2012 12:39, Stefan Leichter wrote: Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov - DWORD dwStyle; + DWORD style; Any reason for changing the name? Such naming convention is ugly and adds nothing but noise in names (lpcsz* prefix is another good example). That's a reason, and the only code that

Re: comctl32: When created with TCS_VERTICAL, TCS_MULTILINE is set automatically

2012-05-17 Thread Stefan Leichter
Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov > - DWORD dwStyle; > + DWORD style; Any reason for changing the name?

Re: kernel32: check the last parameter of K32EnumProcessModules for NULL before use (with test)

2012-05-17 Thread Stefan Leichter
Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov > On 5/17/2012 11:46, Stefan Leichter wrote: > > SetLastError(0xdeadbeef); > > > > +pEnumProcessModules(hpQI,&hMod, sizeof(HMODULE), NULL); > > +ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, "expected > > error=ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED but got %d\n", GetLas

Re: kernel32: check the last parameter of K32EnumProcessModules for NULL before use (with test)

2012-05-17 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 5/17/2012 11:46, Stefan Leichter wrote: SetLastError(0xdeadbeef); +pEnumProcessModules(hpQI,&hMod, sizeof(HMODULE), NULL); +ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, "expected error=ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED but got %d\n", GetLastError()); + +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef); +ret = p

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread K.King
<< A "runs well with patched wine" checkbox might be useful, but would be very confusing. Maybe if it forced the rating to be garbage that would be ok. >> If it was possible my preference would be to be able to see separate rating per vanilla and per non vanilla. The per vanilla should be first

Re: [appdb] Applications working flawlessly using patched wine should be rated Gold

2012-05-17 Thread Frédéric Delanoy
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700 > Dan Kegel wrote: > >> >> Really?  IMHO they should still be silver.  Patches are very hard for the >> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL, >> and appdb is not about POL. >>