On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> wget
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/2/3224B87F-CFA0-4E70-BDA3-3DE650EFEBA5/vcredist_x64.exe
> wine vcredist_x64
> installs fine... but only puts anything in c:\windows\syswow64,
And the things it puts there are 64 bit dlls, whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
17.05.2012 17:05, Jari Vetoniemi wrote:
> This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out test results that were
> either done with patched wine, or some unsupported variant like POL or
> such.
>
That's is exactly the same vision as mine: AppDB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
17.05.2012 11:56, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> If this patch isn't accepted, I wonder why some entries like those for
> Diablo III were accepted, since some indicate you need to apply some
> patches. e.g.
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sCla
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:05:35 +0300
Jari Vetoniemi wrote:
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=24699&iTestingId=70104
> The above example shows only the results from,
> unpatched wine. While the howto section informs
> about patch that can potentially solve all issues,
>
I think the test results should be only from vanilla wine.
While the additional information which can be provided,
should be used to inform about patches and their
affection to the particular application with wine.
This is unless the appdb will allow us to filter out
test results that were either
On Thu, 17 May 2012 09:56:17 +0200
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
> If this patch isn't accepted, I wonder why some entries like those for
> Diablo III were accepted, since some indicate you need to apply some
> patches.
> e.g.
> http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=25953&iTe
On 5/17/2012 12:39, Stefan Leichter wrote:
Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov
- DWORD dwStyle;
+ DWORD style;
Any reason for changing the name?
Such naming convention is ugly and adds nothing but noise in names
(lpcsz* prefix is another good example). That's a reason, and the only
code that
Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov
> - DWORD dwStyle;
> + DWORD style;
Any reason for changing the name?
Thursday 17 May 2012 Nikolay Sivov
> On 5/17/2012 11:46, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> > SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> >
> > +pEnumProcessModules(hpQI,&hMod, sizeof(HMODULE), NULL);
> > +ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, "expected
> > error=ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED but got %d\n", GetLas
On 5/17/2012 11:46, Stefan Leichter wrote:
SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
+pEnumProcessModules(hpQI,&hMod, sizeof(HMODULE), NULL);
+ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, "expected error=ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED
but got %d\n", GetLastError());
+
+SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
+ret = p
<<
A "runs well with patched wine" checkbox might be useful, but would be
very confusing.
Maybe if it forced the rating to be garbage that would be ok.
>>
If it was possible my preference would be to be able to see separate
rating per vanilla and per non vanilla.
The per vanilla should be first
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>>
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
>> and appdb is not about POL.
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo