I'd like to try a real 64 bit app, so on a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04, I tried
sudo apt-get install wine
rm -rf ~/.wine
export WINEARCH=win64
wget
http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/2/3224B87F-CFA0-4E70-BDA3-3DE650EFEBA5/vcredist_x64.exe
wine vcredist_x64
and that installs fine... but o
On Wed, 16 May 2012 15:55:37 -0500
Austin English wrote:
>
> Some of the more popular patches are available in PPA's, and I'd be
> willing to bet that many of the less tech savvy users are running
> Ubuntu and can figure out how to add a PPA.
>
They're also available through PlayOnLinux. Do you
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL, and appdb
>> is not about POL. - Dan
>
> I thinks that using silver won't be correct here either
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>>
>> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
>> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
>> and appdb is not about POL.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
17.05.2012 00:16, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote: -Application works flawlessly with some DLL
> overrides, other settings or third party software. +Application works
> flawlessly with some DLL overrides, some patches applied, other settings
On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:11 -0700
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
> average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL,
> and appdb is not about POL.
>
AppDB test reports are supposed to reflect the performance of the W
Alex Henrie writes:
> Hello,
>
> This patch was marked committed yesterday--thank you for accepting
> it!--but it still isn't showing up in Git. Maybe it was accidentally
> skipped? It needs to be committed before I can submit the UTF-7
> implementation I wrote that builds on it.
It wasn't actua
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
-Application works flawlessly with some DLL overrides, other settings
or third party software.
+Application works flawlessly with some DLL overrides, some patches
applied, other settings or third party software.
Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very h
Hello,
This patch was marked committed yesterday--thank you for accepting
it!--but it still isn't showing up in Git. Maybe it was accidentally
skipped? It needs to be committed before I can submit the UTF-7
implementation I wrote that builds on it.
-Alex
On Wed, 16 May 2012 12:56:00 -0500
Austin English wrote:
>
> Copying an install form windows is unsupported and should be treated as such.
>
The AppDB form has the option "No, but has a workaround" on the dropdown list
for "Installs?" IMO, copying a Windows install is a valid workaround for Ap
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> With the recent release of Diablo III we're are at the same spot: game
> installer auto-installs vcrun2008 redist as a part of installation process, so
> end-user experience is like this game "works out of a box". Problem is that D3
> inst
On 5/16/2012 19:46, André Hentschel wrote:
+ wmsdkidl.idl \
+ wmsbuffer.idl \
This is supposed to be sorted. Also I think you need to add .gitignore
changes as well.
On 16/05/2012 17:22, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
We have only filenames in the registry.
The current code works fine with the adobe postscript driver
and various other driver for PDF printers.
No, the current code copies the entire contents of the DRIVER_INFO struct's
filename entries - this isn'
Hi Huw.
We have only filenames in the registry.
The current code works fine with the adobe postscript driver
and various other driver for PDF printers.
Which native driver makes problems?
Why do you add spaces before and after the the function args and change
idention, bracket style and variab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 18:08, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>> Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine
>> devteam and AppDB maintainers?
>
> It's the way I've been handling things as an admin. It's really the only
> way I can handle it...
>
T
On Wed, 16 May 2012 17:48:28 +0400
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine devteam and
> AppDB maintainers?
It's the way I've been handling things as an admin. It's really the only way I
can handle it, because as an admin, I have to process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 17:56, Dan Kegel wrote:
> 16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
>> platinum.
>
> Agreed.
>
OK then, it would simplify my work significantly - now it wouldn't be re
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> Er, you removed the FIXME, but GdipImageSelectActiveFrame is still a
> stub? You're not changing the image data.
GdipImageSelectActiveFrame is now implemented, the bug is elsewhere.
Anyway, I'm working on that area on both sides of the problem.
--
Dmitry.
16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
> platinum.
Agreed.
appdb ratings are from the point of view of someone who simply
uses their linux distro to install wine, and then tries to install a
game. If no fiddling is required,
Er, you removed the FIXME, but GdipImageSelectActiveFrame is still a
stub? You're not changing the image data.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
> platinum.
Is it the official position that have been agreed throughout Wine devteam and
AppDB maintainers? Because years ago I've been at
On Wed, 16 May 2012 14:14:30 +0400
Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> How should we treat situations like that? From user PoV it's "Platinum" - app
> is
> working out of the box. From real side of things - it is "Gold", as native dll
> override is r
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18421
Your paranoid android
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good day to all subscribers of this list,
I've got a small decision trouble I have to deal with as an AppDB maintainer.
I know that years ago there had been discussion on this topic, but I want to
bring this once on a surface once again so we would ge
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18419
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18419
Your paranoid android
On 05/16/2012 11:32 AM, Marvin wrote:
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbot.winehq.org/Job
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18417
Your paranoid android
On 5/15/2012 22:53, Daniel Jelinski wrote:
+PostMessageA(hTree, WM_RBUTTONUP, 0, (LPARAM)0x10001);
+/* this sequence should NOT send WM_CONTEXTMENU */
+SendMessageA(hTree, WM_RBUTTONDOWN, 2, (LPARAM)0x10001);
Please use defined names for wParam and a MAKELPARAM macro to make a
coor
29 matches
Mail list logo
