Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17646
Your paranoid android
2012/4/2 Lucas Fialho Zawacki :
>> + Suporte a fontes redimensionáveis em recursos.
A more correct translation for:
- Support for scalable font resources.
Would be:
- Suporte para recursos de fontes escaláveis.
Instead of:
- Suporte a fontes redimensionáveis em recursos.
Maybe "redimensionáv
>
> Can you use a separate process -- a Win32 service -- to update this shared
> memory?
>
Something like plugplay.exe? I don't see why not. I'll look over the
plugplay.exe code and see if it looks promising.
cheers,
Joey
On Apr 2, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Joey Yandle wrote:
>> You need to make wineserver multithreaded then, and that idea has been
>> shot down as well.
>
> Yes, either wine or wineserver will need a thread to set these values
> with the required precision.
Can you use a separate process -- a Win32 servi
> It's been continously said that any memory sharing scheme between a client
> and wineserver won't be accepeted, ever.
You're the second person to make that assertion without pointing out the
relevant discussion. Such assertions are not helpful.
> You need to make wineserver multithreaded then,
Joey Yandle wrote:
> > Why do you need to update the data in wineserver and not in the client?
>
> The problem is that the timer updates need to be extremely precise, or
> they are worse than useless. So we can either do that in every wine
> process, or do it once in wineserver and share the me
Hi Juan,
Thanks for replying. I am looking at that tool's directory and I'm not sure
how to use it. There is little documentation on the sources and a google
search didn't provide much help. No matter what directory I run the
executables found there, they all give me this error. Is there a
> Why do you need to update the data in wineserver and not in the client?
The problem is that the timer updates need to be extremely precise, or
they are worse than useless. So we can either do that in every wine
process, or do it once in wineserver and share the memory.
On Windows, the kernel s
Joey Yandle wrote:
> If anyone does know how Alexandre et alia feel about sharing data
> between wine and wineserver, please let me know. It seems the closest
> to what Windows does, in the context of wine. And as long as the
> mapping is read-only from wine, then it seems unlikely to cause too
>
> I know they declined an in-process wineserver due to difficulties
> blaming the right component on a crash: is it the app or wine that's faulty?
>
> I found no other relevant discussion on wine-devel since January 2010,
> when searching for first 'share' and then 'server'.
>
If anyone does
Hi,
I am Alexander Sulfrian and I am currently studding computer science
at the "Freie Universität Berlin". I recently got my bachelor degree
and currently attending the second semester to get my master.
Last year, I took part in the GSoC for vlc and successfully
implemented a library to communica
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Roger Cruz wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to determine programmatically what the arguments to a
> Win32 API implemented in Wine are. I'm trying to implement an API
> redirection stub that I can use to trace calls into all of the
> Wine-implemented DLLs.
I'm looking for a way to determine programmatically what the arguments to a
Win32 API implemented in Wine are. I'm trying to implement an API redirection
stub that I can use to trace calls into all of the Wine-implemented DLLs. My
stub needs to know what each argument passed into the Win32 API
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 22:57, Kristoffer Eklund
wrote:
> Stop e-mail me!
You need to unsubscribe from wine-patches (and possibly wine-devel or
any others lists you subscribed to).
See http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches
--
-Austin
Stop e-mail me!
2 apr 2012 kl. 07.40 skrev Dmitry Timoshkov:
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/font.c | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/font.c b/dlls/gdi32/font.c
> index 230d421..f5c44d8 100644
> --- a/dlls/gdi32/font.c
> +++ b/dlls/gdi32/font.c
>
Huw Davies writes:
> ---
> dlls/winspool.drv/tests/info.c | 110
>
> 1 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M winspool.drv -T ../../.. -p
winspool.drv_test.exe.so info.c && touch in
Aric Stewart writes:
> ---
> dlls/quartz/dsoundrender.c | 28 ++--
> dlls/quartz/nullrenderer.c |2 +-
> dlls/strmbase/renderer.c | 41
> -
> include/wine/strmbase.h|4
> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 20
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17636
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17636
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17637
Your paranoid android
On 2 April 2012 01:15, Gaurav Jain wrote:
> Sounds good, so then are you okay with the patch with only the 6770M, since
> that has a different device ID?
>
The first step should really be getting the description string right.
After that you should verify that that PCI ID is really unique for the
Hi Christian,
On 04/02/12 08:54, Christian Costa wrote:
> {
> IDirect3DRMFrameImpl *This = impl_from_IDirect3DRMFrame2(iface);
> +LPDIRECT3DRMFRAME3 frame;
>
> -FIXME("(%p/%p)->(%p): stub\n", iface, This, child);
> +TRACE("(%p/%p)->(%p)\n", iface, This, child);
>
> -retur
Hello Christian,
On 04/02/2012 09:05 AM, Christian Costa wrote:
> While you're at it, could you put a 4 spaces indentation to whole method.
I thought about that but that would make the patch huge and it is
already big. The re-indentation can be done when the functions get
implemented.
bye
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17632
Your paranoid android
Le 02/04/2012 00:03, Michael Stefaniuc a écrit :
---
-static HRESULT WINAPI IDirectMusicPerformance8Impl_MusicToReferenceTime
(LPDIRECTMUSICPERFORMANCE8 iface, MUSIC_TIME mtTime, REFERENCE_TIME* prtTime) {
- IDirectMusicPerformance8Impl *This = (IDirectMusicPerformance8Impl
*)iface;
+sta
25 matches
Mail list logo
