Re: Changed UrlGetPartA and UrlGetPartW to return the correct (different) values.

2012-03-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 3/21/2012 09:24, Eric Culp wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov > wrote: On 3/21/2012 08:58, Eric Culp wrote: The two functions have different return values on windows for analogous inputs. Changed to match windows beh

Re: Changed UrlGetPartA and UrlGetPartW to return the correct (different) values.

2012-03-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 3/21/2012 08:58, Eric Culp wrote: The two functions have different return values on windows for analogous inputs. Changed to match windows behavior. --- dlls/shlwapi/url.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Please add some tests for that.

Re: Are we the reason Apple isn't helping us?

2012-03-20 Thread Ben Klein
On 21 March 2012 08:02, Mark Wagner wrote: > I just came across this, and I think I see where the root of the problem lies. > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:42, Vitaliy Margolen > wrote: >> ---snip--- >> AJ: >>> >>> Then file a proper bug, showing the exact error and the exact compiler and >>> OS

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Matteo Bruni
Il 20 marzo 2012 19:12, Christian Costa ha scritto: > Le 20/03/2012 18:43, Józef Kucia a écrit : > >> Hi there, >> >> I'm writing to discuss my project proposal for upcoming Google Summer >> of Code. I was recently playing with Wine, looking around in the code >> and searching through Wine bugzill

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Christian Costa
Le 21/03/2012 00:22, Henri Verbeet a écrit : On 21 March 2012 00:14, Józef Kucia wrote: Good to know. I have to delete DDS support from my list. Are there any other repositories with patches waiting for merging? I don't think that code is really waiting to be merged, or even going anywhere at

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Christian Costa
Le 21/03/2012 00:14, Józef Kucia a écrit : On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Christian Costa wrote: Hi Józef, There are some work already done by Tony Wasserka which didn't get in git: http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git DDS support has been added in this patch: http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Tue, 20/3/12, HolyCause wrote: > On 3/20/12 07:22, Maarten Lankhorst > wrote: > > Agreed, would like to add cmd parser to that list too. > > > > ~Maarten > Why is this? Does cmd sound like a bad project? > > FWIW I was planning on improving cmd as my GSoC project, and > I've talked to Da

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 21 March 2012 00:14, Józef Kucia wrote: > Good to know. I have to delete DDS support from my list. Are there any > other repositories with patches waiting for merging? > I don't think that code is really waiting to be merged, or even going anywhere at all.

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Józef Kucia
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Christian Costa wrote: > Hi Józef, > > There are some work already done by Tony Wasserka which didn't get in git: > http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git > > DDS support has been added in this patch: > http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git/commitdiff/f7fd4619de1cd0ea

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread HolyCause
michael, > Getting that into Wine in small and incremental patches will be hard as > a big drop in patch is not an option. I don't know if I understand "a big drop in patch"... Do you mean committing all of the changes as one, large patch? On that note, are GSoC projects done in smaller, indiv

Re: Are we the reason Apple isn't helping us?

2012-03-20 Thread Mark Wagner
I just came across this, and I think I see where the root of the problem lies. On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:42, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > ---snip--- > AJ: >> >> Then file a proper bug, showing the exact error and the exact compiler and >> OS >> version you are using. > > Jeremy: > I can't do that.

Re: GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Christian Costa
Hi Józef, There are some work already done by Tony Wasserka which didn't get in git: http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git DDS support has been added in this patch: http://repo.or.cz/w/wine/d3dx9TW.git/commitdiff/f7fd4619de1cd0ea3bdf9b2fd0195c098d3b9bd0. I have an updated version and planned to s

GSoC 2012 - Implement a few missing functions in D3DX9

2012-03-20 Thread Józef Kucia
Hi there, I'm writing to discuss my project proposal for upcoming Google Summer of Code. I was recently playing with Wine, looking around in the code and searching through Wine bugzilla. As a result I found out that there is still a quite number of functions missing in Wine's D3DX implementation.

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Hello Alex, On 03/20/2012 05:17 PM, HolyCause wrote: > On 3/20/12 07:22, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Agreed, would like to add cmd parser to that list too. >> >> ~Maarten > Why is this? Does cmd sound like a bad project? > > FWIW I was planning on improving cmd as my GSoC project, and I've talked

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread HolyCause
On 3/20/12 07:22, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Agreed, would like to add cmd parser to that list too. ~Maarten Why is this? Does cmd sound like a bad project? FWIW I was planning on improving cmd as my GSoC project, and I've talked to Dan Kegel about it - there's been no protests (only support) t

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 3/20/2012 16:45, Jerome Leclanche wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Nikolay Sivov > wrote: On 3/20/2012 12:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban mailto:ja...@codeweavers.com>> wrote: Hi all,

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jacek Caban
On 03/20/12 14:14, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 03/20/2012 03:43 AM, Jacek Caban wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we >> need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed >> into adding new ones, while we keep obviously

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > On 3/20/2012 12:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we >> need to update our proposals. Usually the mo

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey Jacek, Op 20-03-12 10:43, Jacek Caban schreef: > Hi all, > > GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we > need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed > into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad IMO) > proposals on the

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
On 03/20/2012 03:43 AM, Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad IMO) proposals on the page. I'm planning

Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi all, GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad IMO) proposals on the page. I'm planning to remove following project proposals: Secu

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 3/20/2012 12:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban > wrote: Hi all, GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jacek Caban
On 03/20/12 10:48, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban > wrote: > > Hi all, > > GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good > applications, we > need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is

Re: Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jacek Caban wrote: > Hi all, > > GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we > need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed > into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad IMO) > proposals on th

Updating GSoC proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi all, GSoC is starting this year and, if we want to have good applications, we need to update our proposals. Usually the most attention is directed into adding new ones, while we keep obviously bad (or just bad IMO) proposals on the page. I'm planning to remove following project proposals: Secu

Re: My GSoC 2012 proposal

2012-03-20 Thread Vitaliy
On 03/18/2012 11:22 PM, Lucas Zawacki wrote: Hello all, *Joystick Configuration Tool* This seems like a natural project for me to work since I'm very familiar with DirectInput and have access to some josysticks, including force feedback. I'm not sure about what "Support system joystick calibrat