Re: My GSoC 2012 proposal

2012-03-19 Thread Lucas Zawacki
> I'm not sure if that's outdated. I mean how many people are converting > Applications to winelib, how many of them want to use scons for that, and how > many of them can't do it theirselfs? > But maybe i'm wrong... Actually I think you're right, I don't know how much interest is there for this

Re: My GSoC 2012 proposal

2012-03-19 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 00:22, Lucas Zawacki wrote: > Hello all, > > First of all, I'll introduce myself: I'm Lucas Fialho Zawacki a > Computer Science undergrad at UFRGS > university in Brazil. I have worked with Wine in GSoC 2011 > (http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2011/lfza

Re: Web based translation tool

2012-03-19 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:49:31 + Jerome Leclanche napsal(a): > 2012/3/16 Michal Čihař > > Weblate currently does not try to merge subsequent commits from same > > author, so you get single commit for each change. > > If this is an issue, an intermediary repository can be set up to merge

Re: My GSoC 2012 proposal

2012-03-19 Thread André Hentschel
Am 19.03.2012 06:22, schrieb Lucas Zawacki: > *Scons Wine* > > I think this could turn out to be very worthwhile project, but there's > little documentation about it. To make Scons aware of Winelib would it > be enough to create an environment that uses the winelib compilers, > libs and includes?

Re: usp10: properly handle invalide arguments to ScriptBreak

2012-03-19 Thread Nikolay Sivov
On 3/19/2012 18:56, Aric Stewart wrote: Fix for bug 30219 --- dlls/usp10/usp10.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Could you add a test for that? Or there's some troubles with that, like different native usp10 versions behaviour or anything?

Re: Networking+wine

2012-03-19 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
On 03/19/2012 01:40 PM, prateek papriwal wrote: > http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-f566a12c806a1eacaeefb7cb6419a513a773c571 as > mentioned wine does not provide sandboxing at all but there can be some > wine users would like to prevent Windows apps from accessing unix system > so there is need for

Re: Networking+wine

2012-03-19 Thread prateek papriwal
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-f566a12c806a1eacaeefb7cb6419a513a773c571 as mentioned wine does not provide sandboxing at all but there can be some wine users would like to prevent Windows apps from accessing unix system so there is need for a simple sandboxing interface. Thank you prateek On Mon

Re: Networking+wine

2012-03-19 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:19, prateek papriwal wrote: > Networking + wine (like as running uTorrent in ubuntu) can be very > dangerous. I feel there should be some sandboxing(as in Windows) to prevent > frequent attacks. I would be very interested in implementing sandboxing for > running Wine app