Re: gdiplus: GdipTranslateLineTransform: make stub lie and return Ok

2012-02-14 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > This lets many .net apps run, see bug 23759. I see this patch is marked pending. Since tweaking the stub to lie and return success lets a bunch of .net apps run, it's tempting to say the benefits of the patch outweigh the risk... wine has done

Problems with translatable strings

2012-02-14 Thread Gustavo Henrique Milaré
Hello, I've encountered some issues while translating Wine to Brazilian Portuguese. The first one is in string number 24 (line 150 in wine.pot) which is related to wine control. When you open "wine control" and select the icon "Add/remove programs", the status bar shows "Allows you to install ne

Re: [PATCH 2/2] winealsa.drv: Optionally load extra ALSA device names from the registry

2012-02-14 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andrew Eikum writes: > +while(*p){ > +if(alsa_try_open(p, stream)){ > +if(ids && keys){ > +len = MultiByteToWideChar(CP_UNIXCP, 0, p, -1, NULL, > 0); > +ids[*num] = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, len

Re: winealsa.drv patch to enum all software devices from .asoundrc

2012-02-14 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andrew Eikum writes: > I agree with this analysis. Here's a patch. It uses pipes to separate > device names, since I know commas are meaningful in ALSA. Perhaps > that's not enough, and we need to do quoting? The right way would be to use a MULTI_SZ string. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@wineh

Re: winealsa.drv patch to enum all software devices from .asoundrc

2012-02-14 Thread Нискородов Серёжа
> I agree with this analysis. Here's a patch. It uses pipes to separate > device names, since I know commas are meaningful in ALSA. Perhaps > that's not enough, and we need to do quoting? > > In any case, this patch ought to be enough to satisfy users for 1.4. > Any thoughts, anyone? AFAIK, pipes

Re: winealsa.drv patch to enum all software devices from .asoundrc

2012-02-14 Thread Andrew Eikum
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:08:57PM -0800, Chris Robinson wrote: > For now, I think snd_card_next, with registry options for custom prefixes and > an additional set of devices, is the best way to go. There's simply too much > junk with snd_ctl_name_hint. > I agree with this analysis. Here's a pa