Hello,
Long time no see :D
I've been updating the translation of Wine to Brazilian Portuguese for the
last couple of days. I have checked and made extensive tests (I opened the
programs, used XN Resource Editor on the resources of the dlls and made a
fast review of the diff file).
It turns out t
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> There are also some issues (e.g. in winecfg for "Montrer les options
> avancées" which is quite larger than what the associated button
> allows).
> How are we supposed to tackle those issues now the rc files are no
> more for translations (French
* On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 7 January 2012 10:47, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> > These tests fail on real machines (running XP and w7) with nVidia cards
> > (FX5200 and GF 310M):
> >
> > http://test.winehq.org/data/b00e7039c5fcaa613b9776a38fe60bb697146b42/index_XP.html#ddraw:ddr
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 17:50, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> [...]
>> #: appwiz.rc:64
>> msgid "&Support Info"
>> -msgstr "Inf&ormations de support..."
>> +msgstr "Inf&ormations de support"
>
> I don't know why 'Information' was abbreviated in English. T
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> > Is there that kind of problem in the new tests?
>>
>> No but if the tests didn't catch that problem it's probably a sign that
>> they are not extensive enough.
>
> New tests exercising any desirable behaviour could be added at any poin
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> #: appwiz.rc:64
> msgid "&Support Info"
> -msgstr "Inf&ormations de support..."
> +msgstr "Inf&ormations de support"
I don't know why 'Information' was abbreviated in English. This should
be checked and unabbreviated if it was abusive. But if
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Is there that kind of problem in the new tests?
>
> No but if the tests didn't catch that problem it's probably a sign that
> they are not extensive enough.
New tests exercising any desirable behaviour could be added at any point,
it never was a reason to reject a
You're still using a single static class object, and I'm not convinced
GetIDispatchForObject is a good idea.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
> Hi,
> Use RegGetValueW for the class.
>
> Changelog:
> mscoree: Implement DllGetClassObject
>
>
> Best Regards
> Alist
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > While investigating how to fix the file section access tests in kernel32
> > I've
> > found that some places in Wine deliberately create objects with access
> > rights
> > set to 0, that leads to creation of potentially not accessible objects.
>
> Many of these ar
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> While investigating how to fix the file section access tests in kernel32 I've
> found that some places in Wine deliberately create objects with access rights
> set to 0, that leads to creation of potentially not accessible objects.
Many of these are deliberate. You'll
Michael Stefaniuc writes:
> Now i would have had different options how to deal with that.
> - Silently drop the test.
> - Dropping the test and documenting why it deviates from the standard test.
> - Adding the test and marking it todo_wine.
> - Add the test and fix the code as the change is triv
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16400
Your paranoid android
Hello Joerg,
and addendum inline
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
>> Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>>> static HRESULT WINAPI IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer
>> +if (pUnk) {
>> +WARN("invalid parameter: pUnk != NULL\n");
>> +/* *lplpDSCa
On 01/12/12 14:30, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> static HRESULT WINAPI IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer
> +if (pUnk) {
> +WARN("invalid parameter: pUnk != NULL\n");
> +/* *lplpDSCaptureBuffer = NULL; Not done by native dsound */
> +
Hi,
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>static HRESULT WINAPI IDirectSoundCaptureImpl_CreateCaptureBuffer
+if (pUnk) {
+WARN("invalid parameter: pUnk != NULL\n");
+/* *lplpDSCaptureBuffer = NULL; Not done by native dsound */
+return DSERR_NOAGGREGATION;
+}
What's your ration
On 12 January 2012 09:54, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Would profiling here be worthy of pursuing? Are there known areas of
> bad performance other than graphics?
Profiling definitely sounds like a good idea. At a guess I'd say the
issue lies somewhere in the communication needed with wineserver,
whic
Hi Detlef,
Why do you add them? nsiface.idl should contain only interfaces that we
use. Otherwise it's just adding me more work on each Gecko merge.
Jacek
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to all five users who sent me data.
>
> I've a new testbot job.
> Please download mmdevapi_test32|64.exe
> http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16386
>
> you don't need a microphone, just a capture capable sound card, unlike
> test
Am 11.01.2012 16:23, schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, 23:00:38 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
- Users ... as this was brought up
Reality check: Wine users will not travel 100s of kms to a standalone
conference.
This would make sense only if we attach wineconf to another g
Hello
are there still problems with the patches:
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/82408 and
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/82409 ?
Thanks in advance
A+
David
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> It's still broken. Consider what happens if there's no room for the
>> final null.
>
> Is there that kind of problem in the new tests?
No but if the tests didn't catch that problem it's probably a sign that
they are not extensive enough.
The game is still in beta development, but I just learned something odd
- there are no Linux server binaries (yet), and a lot of admins are
running the dedicated server using Wine.
Wine works, but is actually performing fairly poorly here. I find this
really interesting, as the dedicated server i
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> It's still broken. Consider what happens if there's no room for the
> final null.
Is there that kind of problem in the new tests?
--
Dmitry.
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>> The overflow handling still looks suspicious. It probably needs some
>> more test cases.
>
> I'm probably missing something, why new attempt is marked as pending?
It's still broken. Consider what happens if there's no room for the
final
Hi,
Thanks to all five users who sent me data.
I've a new testbot job.
Please download mmdevapi_test32|64.exe
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16386
you don't need a microphone, just a capture capable sound card, unlike testbot.
there should be next to 0 failures in lines 200-410. Fa
26 matches
Mail list logo
