On January 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM Marcus Meissner wrote:
> - Perhaps a shrinking audience is unavoidable.
>
> This is a bit of a fact that some projects I have been in found hard to
>cope with... That after
> the interest peak it might go down.
>
And if you are looking for a reason, one i
You can't just use a static class factory for all the classes.
There's no need for GetIDispatchForObject when we already have
GetIUnknownForObject (and all you use is QueryInterface).
+res = RegGetValueA( key, NULL, "Class", RRF_RT_REG_SZ, NULL,
classname, &dwBufLen);
We should probably use a
Hi,
Akademy (KDE)
Desktop Summit (KDE + Gnome, although we have tried to get XFCE,
Enlightenment, etc on)
FOSDEM (a bit of everything, huge)
DebConf (Debian)
Libre Software World Conference (a bit of everything, big)
Collocating may be a good idea. Collocating in one of the biggest may
not necess
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> What about Mono? .NET applications that use P/Invoke won't ever work outside
> Windows without Wine, so they kind of need us, and many native applications
> now also use .NET, so we kind of need them. Unlike with Samba, the licenses
> are
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
>
> - Attaching to other conferences?
>
> We do not really share much with other projects (please do not bring up
> Samba: we don't),
>
What about Mono? .NET applications that use P/Invoke won't ever work
outside Windows without Wine, so
On 01/10/2012 10:51 AM, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
2012/1/10 Vitaliy Margolen:
On 01/09/2012 10:18 AM, Lucas Fialho Zawacki wrote:
From: Lucas Fialho Zawacki
+static BOOL _write_private_profile_intW(const char *format, WCHAR*
section, WCHAR* key, int value, WCHAR* file)
I don't think this is such
Every year I attend to FISL here in my home town of Porto Alegre
(Brazil), it's one of the biggest events in Latin America but I reckon
most of wine devs are far north.
I didn't want to hijack the other thread, so I'll just throw an idea
here. It's been some time now that I've wanted to organize a
Jeremy White wrote:
> the Wine conference has been a mostly annual affair since 2002 ...
> It's been in Minnesota about every 3rd year, and is otherwise
> 'normally' somewhere in Europe.
>
> How could Wineconf be different? If you've never been, what would
> encourage you to come?
One thing tha
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> In the wineconf thread, the question came up:
> What other conferences people do wine developers/users attend, if any?
>
> If you send me the names of the conference(s) you attended in the last
> two years,
> I'll summarize for the list.
I've se
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Alex Bradbury wrote:
> Another angle on this might be making some changes to WineConf, but
> also making a concerted effort to make sure Wine is well represented
> at events many developers and users already attend such as FOSDEM and
> OSCON.
In that regard, let
In the wineconf thread, the question came up:
What other conferences people do wine developers/users attend, if any?
If you send me the names of the conference(s) you attended in the last
two years,
I'll summarize for the list.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> The workshop elements we introduced in the last years are however more the
> direction to go.
> So something of a workshop is my best bet at keeping interest.
>
>
> Question is whether we can find workshop style things besides "fixin
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:31:11PM -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This past Wine conference, while great fun as always, was not as well
> attended as Wine conferences in the past.
>
> So I would like to stir up trouble by suggesting we rethink WineConf.
>
> For those that have not atte
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:10:15PM +0100, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 20:55, Andrew Eikum wrote:
> > So it appears we should be able to launch threads in DllMain() without
> > deadlocking.
> >
> > Thoughts, anyone?
> >
> That should be easy enough to test. Is the issue just launching
On 10 January 2012 20:55, Andrew Eikum wrote:
> So it appears we should be able to launch threads in DllMain() without
> deadlocking.
>
> Thoughts, anyone?
>
That should be easy enough to test. Is the issue just launching a
thread though, or actually waiting for it to start?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 01:03:56AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Andrew Eikum wrote:
>
> > So, I'm asking for insights. Should I try hard to avoid launching
> > threads unless absolutely necessary? Is this a known deficiency in the
> > loader, and I should do nothing? Is there some other way t
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes:
> Hi,
>
> now winmm recording does not depend on chunking by mmdevapi.
>
> +if(packet > 0)
> +WARN("losing %u frames\n", packet);
> That part is interesting. Another approach would have been to check whether
> all of GetData could be st
2012/1/10 Vitaliy Margolen :
> On 01/09/2012 10:18 AM, Lucas Fialho Zawacki wrote:
>>
>> From: Lucas Fialho Zawacki
>>
>> +static BOOL _write_private_profile_intW(const char *format, WCHAR*
>> section, WCHAR* key, int value, WCHAR* file)
>
> I don't think this is such a good idea to mix ASCII and W
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:57:58PM +0100, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
wrote:
> Andrew Eikum wrote:
> >I think the GetPosition and GetCurrentPadding failures are caused by
> >using GETOSPACE instead of GETODELAY in GetPosition().
> Please write that patch too. It needs good testing to get the
Dmitry Timoshkov writes:
> +len = MultiByteToWideChar( CP_ACP, 0, format, -1, NULL, 0 );
> +if ((fmt = MSVCRT_malloc( len * sizeof(MSVCRT_wchar_t) )))
> +{
> +MultiByteToWideChar( CP_ACP, 0, format, -1, fmt, len );
> +
> +if ((len = MSVCRT_wcsftime( s, max, fmt, mstm )
On 9 January 2012 18:31, Jeremy White wrote:
> So I'd like to ask folks to brain storm with me.
>
> How could Wineconf be different? If you've never been, what would
> encourage you to come?
Another angle on this might be making some changes to WineConf, but
also making a concerted effort to mak
Users coming to Wineconf will likely want to hear about Wine's development;
what improvements they can expect, the progress on their favourite apps,
etc.
I suspect a great deal of users will also want to share their ideas on what
they feel is important in further developments.
J. Leclanche
On Tu
Andrew Eikum wrote:
> So, I'm asking for insights. Should I try hard to avoid launching
> threads unless absolutely necessary? Is this a known deficiency in the
> loader, and I should do nothing? Is there some other way to work
> around this?
As usually first thing to do is to write some tests a
Andrew Eikum wrote:
>I think the GetPosition and GetCurrentPadding failures are caused by
>using GETOSPACE instead of GETODELAY in GetPosition().
Please write that patch too. It needs good testing to get the
start/stop/underrun corner cases right.
My hope is that Wine-1.4.0 will have 3 drivers of
This mail is about bugs 28042[1] and 28677[2]. In short, what I'm
trying to deal with is buggy applications that make calls to DSound
and WinMM from within DllMain(), causing deadlocks.
On almost any entry into DSound or WinMM's wave functions, the modules
launch a thread to communicate with MMDev
> Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:07 amPost subject:
> If you really want users to come, I suggest you change the second sentence on
> http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf. Right now it sends a very clear message that
> users are not the least bit welcome.
/me winces. I wrote that text; and I ne
Hi,
looking at mmdevapi/tests/capture logs, I found 2 issues
1. the 5 buffers initially sent are all returned with 0 bytes
So I added a loop to return empty buffers to the audio input queue,
such that GetBuffer returns data when GetCurrentPadding shows it.
But why were these buffers returned at
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16361
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=16359
Your paranoid android
29 matches
Mail list logo
