On 12/3/2011 04:35, Bruno Jesus wrote:
If LocalLock fails the buffer is not allocated and get_text_length, which is
used in several different places, will make wine crash.
LocalLock doesn't allocate anything. You need to figure out why buffer
is not allocated at this point.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15748
Your paranoid android
ste...@codeweavers.com writes:
> +static inline BOOL check_d3ddevicedesc_size(DWORD size)
> +{
> +if (size == 172 || size == 204 || size == sizeof(D3DDEVICEDESC) /* 252
> */) return TRUE;
> +return FALSE;
> +}
You should use something like FIELD_OFFSET instead of these magic
constants.
2011/12/2 Francois Gouget :
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> [...]
>> There is now a discrepancy between wine output, and testrunner output, e.g.
>> echo -- eol option
>> for /f "eol=@" %%i in (" ad") do echo %%i
>> echo bar
>>
>> gave
>>
>> -- eol option
>> Syntax error
>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> There is now a discrepancy between wine output, and testrunner output, e.g.
> echo -- eol option
> for /f "eol=@" %%i in ("ad") do echo %%i
> echo bar
>
> gave
>
> -- eol option
> Syntax error
> bar
>
> but not gives
>
> -- eol
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> > As far as I can tell the tests pass both in Wine an on Windows.
> > What is test runner?
>
> The programs/cmd/tests/batch.c file that preprocesses the .cmd file
> and compares it to the associated .exp file; this is run when you do a
> "make te
2011/12/2 Francois Gouget :
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> [...]
>> Would you mind updating the http://wiki.winehq.org/CmdConformanceTests
>> page with your synchronization stuff?
>
> Done.
>
>
>
>> There is now a discrepancy between wine output, and testrunner output, e.g.
>
> As
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> Would you mind updating the http://wiki.winehq.org/CmdConformanceTests
> page with your synchronization stuff?
Done.
> There is now a discrepancy between wine output, and testrunner output, e.g.
As far as I can tell the tests pass both in Win
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:07, Francois Gouget wrote:
> ---
>
> I meant to resend this one as [2/2] in my previous series but forgot.
> With the resynchronization points we can now handle the fixed output
> correctly in the tests this time.
>
> programs/cmd/builtins.c | 20 +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15740
Your paranoid android
10 matches
Mail list logo