Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15692
Your paranoid android
On 29 November 2011 01:23, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 22:05:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> That's probably more a case of laziness by the spec writers than a
>> real requirement for anything that's in there. I suppose there's
>> MESA_texture_signed_rgba for hardware that
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15690
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15691
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15689
Your paranoid android
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 22:05:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> That's probably more a case of laziness by the spec writers than a
> real requirement for anything that's in there. I suppose there's
> MESA_texture_signed_rgba for hardware that couldn't possibly support
> either of those extensions.
On 28 November 2011 21:37, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> The original NV_texture_shader extension is over 10 years old.
> But it has a lot of things beyond signed textures that are specific to Nvidia
> hardware. It is unreasonable to expect other vendors to support it.
> GL_EXT_texture_snorm requires
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 19:00:25 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> I don't suppose you have a link to a public bug tracker for that by any
> chance?
Unfortunately not, Apple considers such bug reports private. I don't think the
efforts to create a public mirror on a voluntary basis went anywhere.
>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Erich E. Hoover wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > ...
> > kernel32.RaiseException is just a wrapper around an ntdll one. I'd expect
> > the kernel32 API be always available despite what MSDN claims.
>
> For some reason that cau
On 28 November 2011 17:57, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> It probably doesn't help that Wine is (partially intentionally, and partially
> unintentionally) crippled on this platform and most users have to use third
> party tools to use it(which we rightfully don't support). Telling users that
> their pla
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 15:21:11 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> My point was pretty much that I care only marginally about that
> argument. Nevertheless, I'm not all that convinced that Wine even has
> a lot of OS X users. If it does, that's certainly not reflected in the
> number of active develop
Francois Gouget wrote:
> Heer is the adjusted patch and corresponding log (still on Windows
> Millenium).
> virtual.c:1744: Test failed: 0: CreateFileMapping should fail
> virtual.c:1745: Test failed: 0: expected ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, got 0
Thanks. Apparently CreateFileMapping never fails u
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
[...]
> Could you please try to remove GENERIC_EXECUTE from the CreateFile call and
> try again?
Heer is the adjusted patch and corresponding log (still on Windows
Millenium).
--
Francois Gouget http://fgouget.free.fr/
If it
On 28 November 2011 12:36, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 23:13:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> I must say that as a Wine developer I care only marginally about running
>> on closed platforms. For CrossOver, OS X is more important of course,
>> but I'm sure we could add anoth
Francois Gouget wrote:
> Here is what I get on Windows Millenium.
Many thanks, but creation of the temp file has failed for some reason (probably
because of GENERIC_EXECUTE), and that invalidates the test results:
virtual.c:1687: Test failed: CreateFile(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\map60F4.TMP) error 87
Co
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15676
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675
Your paranoid android
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 23:13:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> I must say that as a Wine developer I care only marginally about running
> on closed platforms. For CrossOver, OS X is more important of course,
> but I'm sure we could add another hack there. I don't think OS X support
> should be a
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15671
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675
Your paranoid android
Here is what I get on Windows Millenium.
--
Francois Gouget http://fgouget.free.fr/
May your Tongue stick to the Roof of your Mouth with the Force of a Thousand
Caramels.virtual.c:1680: system page size 0x1000
virtual.c:1687: Test failed: CreateFile(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\map60F4.TMP)
23 matches
Mail list logo