Re: [PATCH 5/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceInfoW completely on user side. (resend)

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15692 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 29 November 2011 01:23, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 22:05:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet: >> That's probably more a case of laziness by the spec writers than a >> real requirement for anything that's in there. I suppose there's >> MESA_texture_signed_rgba for hardware that

Re: [PATCH 2/5] user32: Add initial input parameter validations to RawInput functions. (resend)

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15690 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 3/5] user32: Implement GetRawInputDeviceList completely on user side. (resend)

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15691 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/5] user32/tests: Initial tests for RawInput functions. (try 2)

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15689 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 22:05:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > That's probably more a case of laziness by the spec writers than a > real requirement for anything that's in there. I suppose there's > MESA_texture_signed_rgba for hardware that couldn't possibly support > either of those extensions.

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 28 November 2011 21:37, Stefan Dösinger wrote: >> The original NV_texture_shader extension is over 10 years old. > But it has a lot of things beyond signed textures that are specific to Nvidia > hardware. It is unreasonable to expect other vendors to support it. > GL_EXT_texture_snorm requires

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 19:00:25 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > I don't suppose you have a link to a public bug tracker for that by any > chance? Unfortunately not, Apple considers such bug reports private. I don't think the efforts to create a public mirror on a voluntary basis went anywhere. >

Re: user32: Fix 64-bit 'msg' test hang in test_timers (try 2).

2011-11-28 Thread Erich E. Hoover
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Erich E. Hoover wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > > ... > > kernel32.RaiseException is just a wrapper around an ntdll one. I'd expect > > the kernel32 API be always available despite what MSDN claims. > > For some reason that cau

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 28 November 2011 17:57, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > It probably doesn't help that Wine is (partially intentionally, and partially > unintentionally) crippled on this platform and most users have to use third > party tools to use it(which we rightfully don't support). Telling users that > their pla

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag, 28. November 2011, 15:21:11 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > My point was pretty much that I care only marginally about that > argument. Nevertheless, I'm not all that convinced that Wine even has > a lot of OS X users. If it does, that's certainly not reflected in the > number of active develop

Re: [1/2] kernel32: Add a test for protections accepted by CreateFileMapping, make it pass under Wine.

2011-11-28 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Francois Gouget wrote: > Heer is the adjusted patch and corresponding log (still on Windows > Millenium). > virtual.c:1744: Test failed: 0: CreateFileMapping should fail > virtual.c:1745: Test failed: 0: expected ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, got 0 Thanks. Apparently CreateFileMapping never fails u

Re: [1/2] kernel32: Add a test for protections accepted by CreateFileMapping, make it pass under Wine.

2011-11-28 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: [...] > Could you please try to remove GENERIC_EXECUTE from the CreateFile call and > try again? Heer is the adjusted patch and corresponding log (still on Windows Millenium). -- Francois Gouget http://fgouget.free.fr/ If it

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 28 November 2011 12:36, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 23:13:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet: >> I must say that as a Wine developer I care only marginally about running >> on closed platforms. For CrossOver, OS X is more important of course, >> but I'm sure we could add anoth

Re: [1/2] kernel32: Add a test for protections accepted by CreateFileMapping, make it pass under Wine.

2011-11-28 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
Francois Gouget wrote: > Here is what I get on Windows Millenium. Many thanks, but creation of the temp file has failed for some reason (probably because of GENERIC_EXECUTE), and that invalidates the test results: virtual.c:1687: Test failed: CreateFile(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\map60F4.TMP) error 87 Co

Re: [3/5] cmd/tests: Tweak subsection headers so they are treated as resynchronization points.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15676 Your paranoid android

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Don't apply fixups to converted surfaces.

2011-11-28 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 23:13:31 schrieb Henri Verbeet: > I must say that as a Wine developer I care only marginally about running > on closed platforms. For CrossOver, OS X is more important of course, > but I'm sure we could add another hack there. I don't think OS X support > should be a

Re: kernel32/tests: Test deleting a timer right after creating it.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15671 Your paranoid android

Re: [2/5] cmd/tests: Standardize the batch file section headers.

2011-11-28 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15675 Your paranoid android

Re: [1/2] kernel32: Add a test for protections accepted by CreateFileMapping, make it pass under Wine.

2011-11-28 Thread Francois Gouget
Here is what I get on Windows Millenium. -- Francois Gouget http://fgouget.free.fr/ May your Tongue stick to the Roof of your Mouth with the Force of a Thousand Caramels.virtual.c:1680: system page size 0x1000 virtual.c:1687: Test failed: CreateFile(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\map60F4.TMP)