Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15670
Your paranoid android
On 11/27/2011 09:10 PM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDet
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15666
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15664
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15665
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15663
Your paranoid android
Great. Thanks for the explanation
On Nov 27, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 03:24 PM, Roger Cruz wrote:
>> Could you expand what exactly would not work?
> Some copy-protection systems, and any other programs that do dlls patching
> using IPC. They assume that some
On 11/27/2011 03:24 PM, Roger Cruz wrote:
Could you expand what exactly would not work?
Some copy-protection systems, and any other programs that do dlls patching
using IPC. They assume that some system dlls (namely ntdll, kernel32, and
user32) are always loaded to the same address for every sy
My apologies on mispelling your name Maarten
From: Roger Cruz
To: Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: Compiling Wine without prelink
Hi Marteen,
Could you expand what exactly would not work?
Hi Marteen,
Could you expand what exactly would not work? Does Wine place the DLLs at a
particular address and if not specified with the prelink tool, then they will
fail to work? It is my understanding that if the libraries are not prelinked,
then the loading linker will pick its own addres
On 2011-11-27 21:28, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:02:01 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> I'm not entirely sure that we shouldn't just use either
>> EXT_texture_snorm or the NV_texture_shader formats and mark the
>> formats as unsupported otherwise though.
> That's not an opti
Hey Roger,
On 11/27/2011 10:29 PM, Roger Cruz wrote:
> What is the proper way to ask the configure script not to use 'prelink' on
> the generated shared libraries? I don't want to remove the prelink from my
> development platform but just tell the configurator to ignore it.
>
Prelink is only us
What is the proper way to ask the configure script not to use 'prelink' on the
generated shared libraries? I don't want to remove the prelink from my
development platform but just tell the configurator to ignore it.
Thanks
Roger R. Cruz
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15655
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15656
Your paranoid android
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:02:01 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> I'm not entirely sure that we shouldn't just use either
> EXT_texture_snorm or the NV_texture_shader formats and mark the
> formats as unsupported otherwise though.
That's not an option. My iMac doesn't support either extension(r500,
On 27 November 2011 18:15, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +0100, Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> What happens for cases like "60 / 0"? Do we get an exception, or does
>> the function return an error? MSDN for DXGI_RATIONAL says that whole
>> numbers should be represe
On 26 November 2011 15:52, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
wrote:
> + if (!rational->Denominator && !rational->Numerator)
> + return 0;
That's pretty much the same as returning 0 when the numerator is 0.
> C_SRCS = \
> - device.c
> + device.c \
> + swapchain.c
>
I don't thi
On 25 November 2011 21:07, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 25. November 2011, 20:23:01 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> That's silly. If that's really the case that should be fixed.
> I don't see why it is silly. d3d sysmem format -> gl texture format and gl
> texture format -> rgba conversions are
19 matches
Mail list logo
