On 11/25/2011 08:35 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
That's great! When it's done it will be one less out of tree patch to
maintain, always a win.
Ciao,
C
You're free to keep your patches on your own/private tree but if you're
discussing here, I guess you wanted your stuff being committed in the
ma
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Claudio Fontana
>> wrote:
>>> I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
>>> issues under windows older than XP SP3).
>>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Claudio Fontana
wrote:
> I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
> issues under windows older than XP SP3).
>
> The patch contains changes based on your feedback.
Which is completely broken, since the U() macro you suggested to use
is
I have resent the patch as a "try 2" (there was a try 1.5 to fix test
issues under windows older than XP SP3).
The patch contains changes based on your feedback.
Some things I stand by, and won't change.
If you feel differently, you should argue for their validity a little
bit more than "don't us
