Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15456
Your paranoid android
2011/11/15 Henri Verbeet :
> ---
> +UINT end = start_idx + count;
> + start_idx += 7;
> + memset(&field[start_idx >> 3], 0, (end >> 3) - (start_idx >> 3));
Isn't that dangerous if count is < 7 (assuming that is a valid value)?
On 15 November 2011 23:23, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:53:43 Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> It's probably ok to ignore the more obscure cases of getting an
>> earlier interface through QI on a newer interface, but I think we
>> should at least test version differences for inte
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:53:43 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> It's probably ok to ignore the more obscure cases of getting an
> earlier interface through QI on a newer interface, but I think we
> should at least test version differences for interfaces originally
> created with a particular version.
K
Hi Juan,
feel free to send me the patch, I'll test it.
Regards
Hark
On 11/15/2011 09:08 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
Hi all,
in the tidy up I've been doing to iphlpapi, I notice that on Solaris
it's possible to enumerate IPv6 addresses using SIOCGIFCONF. I've got
a patch written that does that, but I h
Hi all,
in the tidy up I've been doing to iphlpapi, I notice that on Solaris
it's possible to enumerate IPv6 addresses using SIOCGIFCONF. I've got
a patch written that does that, but I have no way to test it myself.
If anyone here has some version of Solaris with a machine with IPv6
addresses, eve
On 15 November 2011 20:28, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> In principle I agree, but handling this on a per-test basis won't work. The
> behavior doesn't just depend on the interface version you call, but also the
> version with which the object was created(see e.g. surface::GetDDInterface,
> ddraw::Quer
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 15:19:20 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> (E.g. does calling SetSurfaceDesc() with the original surface desc
> work?
That's a reasonable thing to test, I'll add it to the test(The answer
is no, you can't set the original surface desc).
> What about bits not in DDSD_ALL? Etc.)
I
You are correct about the ones in is_indic, I can replace those with
the Script_XX values.
the other two meaning the WCHARs we are looking for? They are unicode
points. In that regard they are explanatory as they are.
Or i can add extra defines for them
-aric
On 11/15/11 10:03 AM, Henri
That's a fair amount of magic constants in there. The ones in
is_indic() are probably Script_Devanagari and
Script_Malayalam_Numeric, I didn't look at the other two.
On 11/15/2011 14:43, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
On 11/15/11 07:19, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
-if ((ns = xmlGetNsList(This->node->doc, This->node)))
+switch (This->node->type)
{
-if (ns[0]->prefix) *prefix = bstr_from_xmlChar(
ns[0]->prefix );
-xmlFree(ns);
+ca
Piotr Caban writes:
> This function is not safe under Windows 7. I was testing it with
> following program:
>
> static DWORD WINAPI block_stdin(void *arg)
> {
> _lock_file(stdout);
> return 0;
> }
>
> int main( )
> {
> DWORD thread_id;
>
> CreateThread(NULL, 0, block_stdin
On 11/15/11 16:34, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Piotr Caban writes:
@@ -3117,25 +3098,20 @@ int CDECL MSVCRT_fputc(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file)
*/
int CDECL MSVCRT__flsbuf(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file)
{
-MSVCRT__lock_file(file);
-
/* Flush output buffer */
if(file->_bufsiz == 0&&
Piotr Caban writes:
> @@ -3117,25 +3098,20 @@ int CDECL MSVCRT_fputc(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file)
> */
> int CDECL MSVCRT__flsbuf(int c, MSVCRT_FILE* file)
> {
> -MSVCRT__lock_file(file);
> -
> /* Flush output buffer */
> if(file->_bufsiz == 0 && !(file->_flag & MSVCRT__IONBF)) {
>
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15430
Your paranoid android
On 15 November 2011 00:13, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +if (!HWDesc)
> +{
> +WARN("HWDesc is NULL, returning DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS.\n");
> +return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS;
> +}
> +else if(!check_d3ddevicedesc_size(HWDesc->dwSize))
> +{
> +WARN("HWDesc->dwSize is
On 15 November 2011 00:12, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> +/* Tests show that only LPSURFACE and PIXELFORMAT can be set, and
> LPSURFACE is required
> + * for PIXELFORMAT to work */
This may be ok, but note that the test doesn't actually test this.
(E.g. does calling SetSurfaceDesc() with the o
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 14:21:09 Matteo Bruni wrote:
> +case WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8_UNORM: /* Usable in <=dx7 but not
> enumerated in any case */
> +TRACE_(d3d_caps)("[FAILED] - Not enumerated on Windows\n");
> +return FALSE;
The comment "Usable in <=dx7" is mislead
Bernhard Loos writes:
> ---
> dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c | 79
> ++
> dlls/ntdll/virtual.c |5 +++
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c b/dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c
> index 4d4
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15426
Your paranoid android
On 11/14/11 18:26, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Piotr Caban writes:
+static void set_wow64_environment(WCHAR **env)
+{
+static const WCHAR archW[]=
{'P','R','O','C','E','S','S','O','R','_','A','R','C','H','I','T','E','C','T','U','R','E',0};
+static const WCHAR arch6432W[] =
{'P','R'
On 11/15/11 11:46, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15423
Your paranoid android
Hi Nikolay,
On 11/15/11 07:19, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
-if ((ns = xmlGetNsList(This->node->doc, This->node)))
+switch (This->node->type)
{
-if (ns[0]->prefix) *prefix = bstr_from_xmlChar( ns[0]->prefix );
-xmlFree(ns);
+case XML_ELEMENT_NODE:
+case XML_ATTRIBUT
Hi Andrew,
On 11/14/11 21:12, Andrew Eikum wrote:
---
dlls/urlmon/tests/uri.c | 81 +++
dlls/urlmon/uri.c | 15 +++--
2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The patch looks good to me, but could you please add a simpler t
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15418
Your paranoid android
26 matches
Mail list logo
