Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Move the cursor in wined3d_device_set_cursor_position().

2011-10-21 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 21 October 2011 17:12, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Does this address Alexandre's need for a software cursor, or is this > unrelated? > It's related, but software cursors are still somewhat broken.

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Move the cursor in wined3d_device_set_cursor_position().

2011-10-21 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Hi, Does this address Alexandre's need for a software cursor, or is this unrelated? In the tests I recommend to test a bigger cursor in addition to the 32x32 cursor to see what happens in situations where Windows falls back to a software cursor. Stefan On Thursday 20 October 2011 12:42:55 He

Re: [PATCH 2/2] vbscript: Added remaining week day constants implementations

2011-10-21 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15047 Your paranoid android

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vbscript: Added vbSunday constant implementation

2011-10-21 Thread Marvin
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15046 Your paranoid android

Re: dpnet/tests: Avoid casting return value of HeapAlloc calls

2011-10-21 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:13, Marvin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. >> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be >> wrong, but could you please double-check? >> Full results

Re: 80186: [PATCH 2/2] dinput: Restore checks for DirectX 3 buffer size.

2011-10-21 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen >> wrote: > device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: > 80040207 > device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: > 80040207