On 10/19/2011 09:49 AM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The past few days there's been spam messages every few minutes and as
soon as you ban an account an other one appears. Obviously the bots have
figured out the answer to the captcha.
Alrighty then, time f
Just removing the zeros will shift the pattern to the left potentially
producing
an effect that is not expected. I will take a look at what happens on
Windows
to see what needs to be replicated.
On 19 October 2011 20:05, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> damian dixon writes:
>
> > diff --git a/dlls/w
damian dixon writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/pen.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/pen.c
> index b677515..71b1bea 100644
> --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/pen.c
> +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/pen.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ HPEN X11DRV_SelectPen( PHYSDEV dev, HPEN hpen )
>case PS_USERSTYLE:
> physDe
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15011
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15010
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15010
Your paranoid android
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 17:25, Ken Sharp wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23124
>
> Could someone tell me if the attached patch would actually work?
>
> It does compile and works correctly with LANG=en_PH.utf-8 but I'm don't know
> that:
>
> 1. Using an "ln -s" is acceptable, nor if
On 10/19/11 7:11 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Hi Jacek,
build failed here... did you forget #include ?
Yes, it was added by another patch in my tree, thanks.
Jacek
Hi Jacek,
build failed here... did you forget #include ?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:56 AM, wrote:
> This is an experimental automated build and test service.
> Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
>
> For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/Buil
On 19/10/11 16:49, Jeremy Newman wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The past few days there's been spam messages every few minutes and as
soon as you ban an account an other one appears. Obviously the bots have
figured out the answer to the captcha.
Alrighty then, time for
On 10/19/2011 11:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:08:14 L. Rahyen wrote:
On 2011-10-19 (October, Wednesday) 02:37:41 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/18/2011 07:37 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
So any admins actually watching and want to bad roberbdib3a on forum?
Also w
On 10/19/2011 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
The past few days there's been spam messages every few minutes and as
soon as you ban an account an other one appears. Obviously the bots have
figured out the answer to the captcha.
Alrighty then, time for me to change the question... Done!
The new
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 14:08:14 L. Rahyen wrote:
> On 2011-10-19 (October, Wednesday) 02:37:41 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> On 10/18/2011 07:37 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>>> So any admins actually watching and want to bad roberbdib3a on forum?
>>>
>>> Also why aren't every moderator has thes
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 15:50, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:42:29PM +0100, Ken Sharp wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19/10/11 13:43, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:08, Joel Holdsworth
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:04:02AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Sounds like your temporary todo_wine didn't quite do the trick...?
Ah, I see. I was getting a failure on 111 and not 104, presumably due
to different XServers. Anyway they all pass again after the entire
series is applied.
Huw.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 15:50, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:42:29PM +0100, Ken Sharp wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19/10/11 13:43, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>> >On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:08, Joel Holdsworth
>> >wrote:
>> >>Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every bu
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Huw Davies wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:46:49AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> Patches 5-7 failed on WINEDEBUG=warn+heap here:
>> palette.c:104: Test failed: getColor=0028
>> Might be flaky; patch 8 passed. patches 9 and 10 aren't done testing yet.
>
> It's
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:46:49AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Patches 5-7 failed on WINEDEBUG=warn+heap here:
>
> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p
> gdi32_test.exe.so palette.c && touch palette.ok
> ...
> palette.c:104: Test failed: getColor=0028
>
> Might be flaky
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:42:29PM +0100, Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> On 19/10/11 13:43, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:08, Joel Holdsworth
> >wrote:
> >>Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every build snapshot,
> >>and placing that on a server somewhere?
> >
Patches 5-7 failed on WINEDEBUG=warn+heap here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p
gdi32_test.exe.so palette.c && touch palette.ok
...
palette.c:104: Test failed: getColor=0028
Might be flaky; patch 8 passed. patches 9 and 10 aren't done testing yet.
On Wed, Oct 1
On 19/10/11 13:43, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:08, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every build snapshot,
and placing that on a server somewhere?
e.g. a folder full of 36def4af0ca85a1d0e66b5207056775bcb3b09ff.tar.gz files?
On 19/10/11 03:37, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/18/2011 07:37 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
So any admins actually watching and want to bad roberbdib3a on forum?
Also why aren't every moderator has these rights to block spammers,
since we
have only one forum.
So no takers? I'm guessing we ne
Akihiro Sagawa writes:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:14:36 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Akihiro Sagawa writes:
>>
>> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> > EXTRADEFS = -D_GDI32_
>> > MODULE= gdi32.dll
>> > IMPORTLIB = gdi32
>> > -IMPORTS = advapi32
>> > +IMPORTS = advapi32 user32
>>
>> You don't
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:08, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every build snapshot,
> and placing that on a server somewhere?
>
> e.g. a folder full of 36def4af0ca85a1d0e66b5207056775bcb3b09ff.tar.gz files?
tar.xz would compress better
> Then one c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.10.2011 um 11:49 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 18 October 2011 17:37, Henri Verbeet wrote:
>> patch 3/7". The point is that test_lockrect_offset() is about the
>> offset calculation, not so much about what valid rectangles for block
>> based for
On 2011-10-19 (October, Wednesday) 02:37:41 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 07:37 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> > So any admins actually watching and want to bad roberbdib3a on forum?
> >
> > Also why aren't every moderator has these rights to block spammers, since
> > we have only one for
Alternatively, have you considered doing a .tar.gz of every build snapshot, and
placing that on a server somewhere?
e.g. a folder full of36def4af0ca85a1d0e66b5207056775bcb3b09ff.tar.gz files?
Then one could write a simple wine regression bisect tool that implements
similar semantics to git bise
On 18 October 2011 17:37, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> patch 3/7". The point is that test_lockrect_offset() is about the
> offset calculation, not so much about what valid rectangles for block
> based formats are.
28 matches
Mail list logo
