On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 07:47:32PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> ICU is impossible to dynamically link with, and it's size is quite huge
> if statically linked.
>
Huh ?
/usr/lib/libicudata.so.48/usr/lib/libiculx.so.48
/usr/lib/libicutest.so.48/usr/lib/libicui18n.so.48
/usr/lib/libicutu.so
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 22:46, wrote:
> ---
> dlls/winex11.drv/keyboard.c | 563
> ++-
> 1 files changed, 499 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Please follow patch submission rules from
http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches
Hi developers,
I've just sent my first patch I would like to see in mainline. I did quite
some efforts to verify that my patch is correct by doing extensive compares
with Windows, the wine before and the patched wine as well as a special
testing version of wine.
I want to fix this bug http://b
Can we have a WARN message in case of .NET 1 applications?
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 2:07 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
>>
>> Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
>> support ICorDebugManagedCallback2 ?
>
> Yes, this is a
On 11/10/2011 2:07 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
support ICorDebugManagedCallback2 ?
Yes, this is a requirement for debugging .NET 2 applications.
Best Regards
Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Am 10.10.2011 17:33, schrieb Rafał Mużyło:
> Anyway, if DUCET and Windows default differ is dumping that default even
> allowed ?
I don't think so... I once was hacking on our collation stuff too to fix
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163 but i guess dumping the windows
stuff wouldn't eve
On 10/10/2011 02:48 AM, Rafał Mużyło wrote:
> Right now, wine claims to use DUCET data for lingustic sorting, but by
> section 1.9.2 of that document (as of version 6.0.0), uses it in a wrong
> way. The result of it are bugs such as #10767 and #9583.
>
> A possible way around it would beby using IC
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:16:26PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote (and
contradicted himself):
> What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
>
DUCET: Default Unicode Collation Element Table
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10767#c1
> > but by
> > section 1.9.2 of that document
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 04:16:26PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote (and
contradicted himself):
> What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
>
DUCET: Default Unicode Collation Element Table
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10767#c1
> > but by
> > section 1.9.2 of that document
Should SetManagedHandler really fail if the given object doesn't
support ICorDebugManagedCallback2 ?
You've got a stray whitespace change in RuntimeHost_Destroy.
Otherwise, this looks good to me.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Only Release the interface
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Bernhard Loos wrote:
> ---
> dlls/ntdll/virtual.c | 38 ++
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I think this needs tests, the algorithms are very fragile.
Ciao, Marcus
> diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/virtua
This patch is experimental but people had some interest in testing it
and I would love some more testing.
What is currently known not to be working:
* Tabs
* Font Fallback
* Complex composed glyphs are not breaking or highlighting properly.
Testing is appreceated. Send me crashes or incorrec
On Monday 10 October 2011 10:20:15 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> It's not really clear to me that refusing to create P8 surfaces in
> d3d8/9 really gains us much, or that it's really a prerequisite for
> the other patches.
I guess you've got a point here, if we just allow the surfaces we'll end up
with t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> Can't you just handle this in ddraw_surface_delete_attached_surface()?
> I.e., replace the Release calls in
> ddraw_surface?_DeleteAttachedSurface() with a
> IUnknown_Release(Surf->attached_iface) in
> ddraw_surface_delete_attached_surface()
On 9 October 2011 17:31, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> - I can't say I find e.g. sprinkling d3dformat_is_palettized() over
>> the code particularly elegant.
> I suppose I could check for it in IDirect3DDevice8Impl_CreateSurface(and the
> d3d9 equivalent), if all calls that create surfaces run throug
Rafał Mużyło wrote:
> Right now, wine claims to use DUCET data for lingustic sorting,
What's DUCET and where do you see Wine does claim to use it?
> but by
> section 1.9.2 of that document (as of version 6.0.0), uses it in a wrong
> way.
Could you please be slightly more specific?
> The resul
On 10 October 2011 08:07, Octavian Voicu wrote:
> +static HRESULT delete_attached_surface_helper(IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl *root,
> IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl *detach)
> +{
> + if (detach->attached_iface == &detach->IDirectDrawSurface4_iface)
> + return
> IDirectDrawSurface4_DeleteAttachedSur
17 matches
Mail list logo